11 Senators Sign Letter Asking DOT/State To Reverse Cuba Flight Changes; Only One Senator From State With Flights To Cuba

On 1 November 2019, United States Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota), Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland), Tom Udall (D-New Mexico), Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts), Tammy Duckworth (D-Illinois), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island), Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island), Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), Jeanne Shaheen (D-New Hampshire), and Chris Murphy (D-Connecticut) sent a letter to the United States Department of State and United States Department of Transportation. 

The letter requests the Trump Administration to re-instate regularly-scheduled commercial airline services for airports in the Republic of Cuba in addition to Jose Marti International Airport (HAV) in Havana, Republic of Cuba. 

Of the senators signing the letter, only one is from a state which has regularly-scheduled commercial airline service to the Republic of Cuba: Massachusetts.  Senator Edward Markey (D- Massachusetts) did not sign the letter. 

There are no senators signing the letter from the other states that have regularly-scheduled commercial airline services to the Republic of Cuba: Florida, Georgia, New York, and Texas. 

LINK TO TEXT OF LETTER

US-Senate-Seal.png

IAG (British Airways, Iberia, Air Lingus) Purchase Of Air Europa Could Trigger US-UK-Spain-Ireland Conflict

On 25 September 2019, Mr. Jose Ramon Lopez Regueiro filed a lawsuit (1:19-cv-23965) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Fort Worth, Texas-based American Airlines, Inc. (2018 revenues exceeded US$44 billion) and Las Condes, Chile-based LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (2018 revenues exceeded US$9.9 billion).   

The attorneys representing the plaintiff confirmed that Llucmajor, Spain-based Air Europa Lineas Aereas S.A.U. (2018 revenues exceeded US$2.3 billion) was notified that it could be included as a defendant in the lawsuit unless a settlement offer was forthcoming. 

Air Europa, the third-largest airline in Spain, is a subsidiary of Globalia Corporacion Empresarial, S.A. (2018 revenues approximately US$4 billion) whose hotel subsidiary, Be Live Hotels manages seven (1,502 rooms) properties in the Republic of Cuba which account for 31.6% of the company’s global room inventory.  Among its forty-four aircraft fleet, Air Europa operates twelve (12), with orders for fourteen (14), Boeing 787-8/9 Dreamliners and has orders for twenty-two (22) Boeing 737- MAX 8 aircraft.   

Including Air Europa in the lawsuit could now impact the United Kingdom along with Spain, potentially creating bilateral and trilateral commercial, economic and political stresses with the United States. 

On 4 November 2019, London, United Kingdom-based International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A. (IAG; 2019 revenues exceeded US$30.5 billion) which controls Madrid, Spain-based Lineas Aereas de Espana, S.A. (Iberia; a member of the 13-airline oneworld Alliance), Hounslow, United Kingdom-based British Airways (member of oneworld alliance), Dublin, Ireland-based Air Lingus (member of oneworld Alliance) and Barcelona, Spain-based Vueling Airlines S.A. reported that IAG has agreed to acquire Air Europa. 

Iberia, which services Jose Marti International Airport (HAV) in Havana, Republic of Cuba, may also be included as a defendant in the lawsuit.   

The lawsuit was filed using Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of 1996 (known as “Libertad Act”).  Title III authorizes lawsuits in United States District Courts against companies and individuals who are using a certified claim or non-certified claim where the owner of the certified claim or non-certified claim has not received compensation from the Republic of Cuba or from a third-party who is using (“trafficking”) the asset.  Title IV of the Libertad Act restricts entry into the United States by individuals who have connectivity to unresolved certified claims or non-certified claims.  One Canada-based company is currently known to be subject to this provision based upon a certified claim.  Unknown if legal counsel for Mr. Lopez will seek administrative action using Title IV.   

The asset of focus is in Rancho Boyeros, created in 1976 as one of the fifteen municipalities in the city of Havana, Republic of Cuba.  Specifically, the target is what was known as Rancho-Boyeros Airport and today is known as HAV.  Approximately fifty-one (51) airlines service HAV, including five (5) United States-based airlines.  

Mr. Jose Ramon Lopez is a citizen of Spain who became a United States citizen through naturalization after the implementation of the Libertad Act 1996.  Mr. Lopez’s father, Jose Lopez Vilaboy, died in 1989 in Florida; a probate court confirmed he was an heir to his father’s estate. 

Mr. Lopez believes he has standing to file a lawsuit(s) for some of the assets (bank, hotels, factories, newspaper, airlines and an airport) of his father that were expropriated in 1959 without compensation by the government of the Republic of Cuba.  Any claim filed by Mr. Lopez would not be considered a certified claim.  NOTE: There are attorneys who believe language in the Libertad Act requires a plaintiff to have been a United States national prior to implementation of the Libertad Act in order to bring a lawsuit using the Libertad Act; a judge likely will decide. 

On 11 September 2019, Mr. Lopez was included (for an hotel claim) in a list of thirty-nine (39) individuals who are seeking class action status in a lawsuit (Case 1:19-cv-22529) previously filed against Melia Hotels International, SA.; Melia Hotels USA, LLC; Expedia, Inc.; Trivago GmbH, Hotels.com L.P.; Hotels.com GP, Orbitz LLC, Travelocity.com, LP; Booking.com B.V.; Booking Holdings Inc.; Grupo Hotelero Gran Caribe, Corporacion de Comercio Y Turismo Internacional Cubanacan S.A.; Grupo De Turismo Gaviota S.A.; Rail Doe 1-5; and Mariela Roe 1-5.   

LINK To Libertad Act Lawsuit Statistics

International Airlines Group (IAG)
Hardmondsworth, London, United Kingdom
4 November 2019
Agreement for the acquisition of Air Europa for €1 billion

International Consolidated Airlines Group ("IAG") and Globalia ("Globalia") are pleased to announce that definitive transaction agreements have been signed under which IAG’s wholly owned subsidiary, IB OPCO Holding S.L. (“Iberia”), has agreed to acquire the entire issued share capital of Air Europa ("Air Europa") for €1 billion to be satisfied in cash at Completion (the “Acquisition”) and subject to a closing accounts adjustment. 

Highlights

Transforms IAG’s Madrid hub into a true rival to Europe’s four largest hubs: Amsterdam, Frankfurt, London Heathrow and Paris Charles De Gaulle.  Re-establishes IAG as a leader in the highly attractive Europe to Latin America and Caribbean market.  Offers significant synergy potential in terms of cost and revenue.  EPS accretive in the first full year and accretive to IAG’s return on invested capital by the fourth year after Completion.  Completion is expected to take place in H2 2020 following receipt of relevant approvals. 

Commenting on today’s announcement, Willie Walsh, Chief Executive of IAG, said: “Acquiring Air Europa would add a new competitive, cost effective airline to IAG, consolidating Madrid as a leading European hub and resulting in IAG achieving South Atlantic leadership, therefore generating additional financial value for our shareholders.  IAG has a strong track record of successful acquisitions, most recently with the acquisition of Aer Lingus in 2015 and we are convinced Air Europa presents a strong strategic fit for the group.” 

Javier Hidalgo, Chief Executive of Globalia, said: “For Globalia, the incorporation of Air Europa to IAG implies the strengthening of the company’s present and future that will maintain the path followed by Air Europa in the last years. We are convinced that the incorporation of Air Europa to a group such as IAG, who over all these years has demonstrated its support to the development of airlines within the group and the Madrid hub, will be a success”. 

Luis Gallego, Chief Executive of Iberia, said: “This is of strategic importance for the Madrid hub, which in recent years has lagged behind other European hubs. Following this agreement, Madrid will be able to compete with other European hubs on equal terms with a better position on Europe to Latin America routes and the possibility to become a gateway between Asia and Latin America.” 

Strategic rationale

Air Europa is one of the leading private airlines in Spain, operating scheduled domestic and international flights to 69 destinations, including European and long-haul routes to Latin America, the United States of America, the Caribbean and North Africa. In 2018, Air Europa generated revenue of €2.1 billion and an operating profit of €100 million. It carried 11.8 million passengers in 2018 and ended the year with a fleet of 66 aircraft. 

The Board of IAG believes that the transaction would: Increase the importance of IAG’s Madrid hub, transforming it into a true rival to Europe’s big four hubs: Amsterdam, Frankfurt, London Heathrow and Paris Charles De Gaulle; Unlock further network growth opportunities and re-establish IAG’s South Atlantic leadership; and Result in significant customer benefits through providing increased choice and schedule flexibility and greater opportunities to earn and redeem miles.  The Air Europa brand will initially be retained and the company will remain as a standalone profit centre within Iberia run by Iberia CEO Luis Gallego. The managements of IAG and Iberia anticipate opportunities to unlock value through the Acquisition across three key areas: Integrating Air Europa into the existing Iberia hub structure at Madrid; Creating commercial links between Air Europa and other IAG operating companies, in addition to inclusion into IAG’s joint businesses; Integrating Air Europa onto the IAG platform of common services. 

Synergies and financial impact

The Acquisition is expected to generate cost synergies across selling, general and administrative expenses, procurement, handling and distribution costs with full run-rate synergies to be achieved by 2025. IAG expects implementation costs to be phased over the same period.  In addition, the Acquisition is expected to generate significant revenue synergies by 2025, including: Adding reciprocal intra-group codeshares across all connecting gateways; Adjusting timings to maximise connectivity through the Madrid hub; Aligning commercial policies and integrating sales forces in home markets; Integrating Air Europa into existing IAG joint businesses; and Integrating Air Europa into the Avios currency for loyalty.  The Acquisition is expected to be earnings accretive in the first full year following Completion and accretive to IAG’s return on invested capital within four years after Completion. 

Financing and expected timetable

The Acquisition will be funded by external debt. After Completion, IAG’s net debt to EBITDA is expected to be 0.3 times higher as a result of the Acquisition compared to 1.2 times last reported at the end of Q3 2019.  Assuming satisfaction of all conditions to the Acquisition, Completion is expected to take place in 2H 2020.  IAG has agreed to pay Air Europa a break fee of €40 million in the event that the transaction fails to receive the necessary regulatory approvals and either party elects to terminate the transaction agreement.  The Acquisition constitutes a Class 2 transaction for the purposes of the UK Financial Conduct Authority's Listing Rules and, as such, does not require IAG’s shareholders' approval. The gross assets of Air Europa at 31 December 2018 were €901 million. The pre-tax profits attributable to Air Europa for the year ended 31 December 2018 were €67 million.

IAG-Logo-916x509.gif

Avianca Airlines Suspends Ticket Sales With Cuba; Carnival Corporation Had A Similar OFAC Issue In 1997

Bogota, Colombia
October 31, 2019


“Panama City, Panama-based Avianca Holdings (“Avianca”) informs that, while they resolve a pending matter with the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) related to their Cuba-related commercial operations, Avianca will suspend ticket sales to and from Cuba as of October 31, 2019. Any additional information will be shared in a timely manner with Avianca’s clients and the general public.”

History Of The Decision

“As previously reported on October 23rd, because of the financial structure to obtain a loan, Synergy Aerospace Corp. (“Synergy”), a majority shareholder of Avianca Holdings, formed in Delaware, United States, the limited liability company BRW, to which Synergy unilaterally transferred all its shares of Avianca Holdings. At that moment, Avianca became considered a company subject to U.S. regulations with respect to the economic embargo that the United States holds against Cuba. Therefore, after reviewing the case, Avianca identified that its commercial operations to and from Cuba could have unintentionally infringed the U.S. Cuban Assets Control Regulations (the “CACR”). Avianca voluntarily disclosed this situation to the U.S. authorities (OFAC), and Avianca is cooperating with OFAC to provide the information necessary to achieve timely resolution of this matter.”

23 October 2019

“Avianca Holdings S.A., a company organized under the laws of Panama (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”), recently became aware that it is presently subject to U.S. jurisdiction for purposes of certain U.S. sanctions laws and regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. This jurisdictional nexus was established as a result of the transfer, on November 9, 2018, by the Company’s parent company, Synergy Aerospace Corp. (“Synergy”), of approximately 78% of the Company’s voting common shares (the “Share Transfer”) from a Panama based company to a Delaware limited liability company wholly-owned by Synergy (“BRW”). Synergy formed BRW and effected the Share Transfer unilaterally in connection with BRW obtaining a loan from United Airlines.”

”Having become aware that as a consequence of the ownership change the Company is considered a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction by OFAC, the Company engaged outside counsel to conduct a review aimed at identifying any potential violations of U.S. sanctions regulations. As a result of this review, the Company identified that the regularly scheduled commercial passenger flights between cities in Central and South America and Havana, Cuba and related Cuba operations that it has historically conducted may have constituted inadvertent violations of the U.S. Cuban Assets Control Regulations (the “CACR”) during the period following the Share Transfer. During the period beginning on the date of the Share Transfer and ending on September 30, 2019, such flights to and from Havana, Cuba comprised an immaterial amount of the Company’s gross revenues.”

”On September 25, 2019, the Company submitted to OFAC a preliminary voluntary self-disclosure addressing such potential inadvertent violations. The Company also plans to submit to OFAC a request for specific authorization for its subsidiary airlines to continue to conduct flights to and from Cuba during a wind-down period or until such time as the Company is no longer subject to the CACR. There can be no assurance that such request will be granted.”

”The Company is committed to fully cooperating with OFAC, but it is too early to predict what action OFAC may take in this regard (including sanctions and fines) and what effect such action could have on the Company’s reputation, business, financial position or results of operations.”

”This Report on Form 6-K is incorporated by reference into the Company’s Exchange Offer Memorandum and Consent Solicitation Statement, dated August 14, 2019, as supplemented, in respect of the Company’s previously reported offer to exchange any and all of its 8.375% Senior Notes due 2020 for newly issued 8.375% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.” LINK To SEC Form 6-K Filing

A Similar Problem In 1997 For Carnival Corporation

From 1995 until 1998, Genoa, Italy-based Costa Crociere operated the “Costa Playa” cruise ship which visited the Republic of Cuba and a subsidiary of Costa Crociere developed and managed the US$11 million passenger ship facility at the Port of Havana. In 1997, Miami, Florida-based Carnival Corporation & plc (2018 revenues exceeded US$18.8 billion) purchased a 50% interest in Costa Crociere.

In 1998, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury in Washington, D.C., required Carnival Corporation to cease both the operation of the “Costa Playa” to the Republic of Cuba and the management of the passenger ship facility. Costa Crociere had a 50% interest in Silares Terminales del Caribe, a joint venture with the Republic of Cuba established to manage three cruise ship terminals in Havana, Santiago de Cuba and Isla de la Juventud.

In 2000, Carnival Corporation & plc purchased the remaining 50% of Costa Crociere from Peterborough, United Kingdom-based Airtours Group plc. LINK To Media Release

The OFAC authorizes companies subject to United States law to have non-controlling investments in third country companies that have commercial activities within the Republic of Cuba provided that the investments do not result in control in fact of the third country company and provided that a majority of the revenues of the third country company are not produced from commercial activities within the Republic of Cuba [OFAC 4 March 1994].

Today, Istanbul, Turkey-based Global Ports Holding (2018 revenues exceeded US$124 million), which also has a registered office in London, United Kingdom, and is listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) has “a management agreement in Cuba to advise and consult on cruise port management best practice. The cruise terminal is in the Sierra Maestra complex, in San Francisco pier, with a current capacity for two ships.”

According to the company, the duration of the management contract is thirty-three (33) years with “no future Capex Obligation” and “Tariff Discretion.” The company reported that the management contract was not a result of a “Competitive Process” and the Process Description was defined as an “Uncompetitive tender” with comments “GPH submitted and unsolicited tender.” However, the 2018 Annual Report for the company references that the management contract is for fifteen (15) years.

According to the company, “Global Ports Holding Plc (GPH) is the world's largest [independent] cruise port operator with an established presence in the Caribbean, Mediterranean, Asia-Pacific regions, including extensive commercial port operations in Turkey and Montenegro.”

Global Ports Holding Plc may be subject to a lawsuit under Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of 1996 (known as “Libertad Act”). Title III authorizes lawsuits in United States District Courts against companies and individuals who are using a certified claim or non-certified claim where the owner of the certified claim or non-certified claim has not received compensation from the Republic of Cuba or from a third-party who is using (“trafficking”) the asset.

Thus far, Miami, Florida-based Carnival Corporation; Miami, Florida-based MSC Cruises; Miami, Florida-based Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings; and Miami, Florida-based Royal Caribbean Cruises are defendants in lawsuits using Title III due to their operations in the Republic of Cuba.

LINK To Complete Analysis In PDF Format

El Nuevo Herald
Miami, Florida
31 October 2019


Avianca Holdings announced Thursday the immediate suspension of the sale of tickets to Cuba "while resolving a pending issue" with the US authorities on its operations on the island that is related to the economic embargo that weighs on the Caribbean country.

The measure was taken because Avianca Holdings constituted this month a limited liability company in the United States to obtain a loan, which is subject to the regulations of that country.

“Avianca Holdings informs that, while resolving a pending issue with the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), related to the commercial operation to Cuba, the company will suspend the sale of tickets to and from Cuba as of December 31 October 2019, ”the company said in a statement.

Avianca currently has a daily flight to Havana from Bogotá and another from San Salvador, which will continue to operate while the case is resolved, but it is not ruled out that the suspension of ticket sales extends to operations as such.

"The tickets already issued remain normal and will be fulfilled" but in the hypothetical case that the measure is extended to the suspension of flights the company will have to accommodate other airlines to those who have already bought tickets, a source of the company.

On October 23, Avianca Holdings announced that, as part of the financial structure for obtaining a loan, its majority shareholder, Synergy Aerospace Corp, established in the state of Delaware (USA), the limited liability company BRW, a which unilaterally transferred all its shares of the conglomerate.

With that operation "Avianca came to be considered as a company subject to US regulations regarding the economic embargo that said country is holding against Cuba," the company added.

“In that sense, after reviewing the situation, the company identified that its commercial operations to and from Cuba could have involuntarily violated US regulations for the control of Cuban assets,” of which Avianca voluntarily informed the OFAC.

The company added that it cooperates with that agency "to deliver the necessary information and timely resolve this situation."

The Government of the United States activated on May 2, Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, which allows Americans to sue companies operating in land or real estate in Cuba expropriated after the 1959 Revolution, including airports.

As part of the tightening of the US embargo on Cuba by the Administration of President Donald Trump, last Friday the Government announced the ban on air service between the United States and Cuba within 45 days, a measure that will affect nine airports in the island and of which the only exempt will be that of Havana.

EFE
Madrid, Spain
31 October 2019


Avianca announced that as of Thursday, October 31, the sale of tickets to travel to the Greater Antilles was suspended while resolving an issue with the US Office of Foreign Assets Control. The Colombian airline Avianca suspends the sale of tickets to Cuba

BOGOTA - The Colombian airline Avianca announced Thursday the suspension of flights to Cuba after in recent days the company reported that its commercial flights to and from the island could have violated US measures on Cuban assets.

According to a report by El Espectador, Avianca announced that as of Thursday, October 31, the sale of tickets to travel to the Greater Antilles was suspended while resolving an issue with the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States ( OFAC).

While the US authorities respond to their requests, such as a license to continue flights to the Caribbean island, Avianca decided to suspend the sale of tickets and said that "any additional information will be shared in a timely manner to customers."

It is worth remembering, El Espectador points out, that the company must be accountable to the US since November 2018, when Synergy Aerospace Corp., the company's parent company, transferred 78% of the ordinary and voting shares of a company established in Panama to BRW, which is incorporated in the state of Delaware (USA) and is its property.

The finding was the result of an external review contracted by the company to identify any potential violation of the United States sanction rules, the report concludes.

The Government of Donald Trump announced last Friday the cancellation of flights of US airlines to various destinations on the island, except Havana, a decision that deepens the sanctions on the Caribbean nation since the activation on May 2 of Title III of the Helms-Burton Act.

Washington has reinforced its policy against the Cuban regime and blames it for being an ally of the dictatorship of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela.

The measures taken by the Trump administration seek to prevent US dollars from reaching the coffers of the island's government and military companies that are responsible for exercising repression against dissidents and opponents.

MLB Commissioner Plays Golf With President Trump; Renewed Life For Cuba Agreement? Second-Base For Lobbyist?

On 26 October 2019, The White House reported: “Today President Donald J. Trump played golf with Major League Baseball [MLB] Commissioner Rob Manfred and Senators Lindsey Graham [R- South Carolina] and David Perdue [R- Georgia].

On 10 June 2019, Commissioner Manfred met in the Oval Office at The White House with President Trump for a “meeting on Major League Baseball’s efforts to combat human trafficking.”

That meeting was likely a result of a decision by MLB to retain Washington DC-based Ballard Partners to lobby [LINK To Filing] on “issues related to combating human trafficking.” A Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 filing with the United States Congress on 8 May 2019 listed Mr. Brian Ballard and Mr. Sylvester Lukis as lobbyists. The filing did not disclose payments to Ballard Partners.

A 7 April 2019 Tweet from The Honorable John R. Bolton, then-Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs: “Cuba wants to use baseball players as economic pawns—selling their rights to Major League Baseball. America’s national pastime should not enable the Cuban regime‘s support for Maduro in Venezuela.

On 5 April 2019, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury rejected [LINK To Letter] an agreement [LINK] between MLB and the Republic of Cuba government-operated Federacion Cubana de Beisbol (FCB).

Previous Analysis:

10 June 2019
Cuba Lobbyist Works? President Trump To Participate In Oval Office Meeting With MLB To Discuss “Human Trafficking”
https://www.cubatrade.org/blog/2019/6/10/cuba-lobbyist-works-president-trump-to-participate-in-oval-office-meeting-with-mlb-to-discuss-human-trafficking?rq=MLB

9 April 2019
OFAC Responds To Major League Baseball Proposal For Players From Cuba
https://www.cubatrade.org/blog/2019/4/9/ofac-responds-to-major-league-baseball-proposal-for-players-from-cuba?rq=MLB

11 January 2019
MLB Might Consider Three Options To Obtain Support For Agreement With Cuba
https://www.cubatrade.org/blog/2019/1/11/mlb-might-consider-three-options-to-obtain-support-for-agreement-with-cuba?rq=MLB

20 December 2018
Another Obama (Ben Rhodes) Administration Legacy Decision Harms Major League Baseball
https://www.cubatrade.org/blog/2018/12/20/uppblm8km7qmk28ly7ilzjz7xgty54?rq=MLB

16 March 2016
New OFAC Regulation Benefits MLB Players; Performers & Teachers Too
https://www.cubatrade.org/blog/2016/3/16/pdx1fcle5mbj7202fg30lmjisro0kc?rq=MLB

29 February 2016
Some Parallels Between President Obama’s Baseball And President Nixon’s Ping Pong
https://www.cubatrade.org/blog/2016/2/29/some-parallels-between-president-obamas-baseball-and-president-nixons-ping-pong?rq=MLB

51kW3fNV08L._SX466_.jpg

SEC 10-Q Filings For Libertad Act Lawsuits: Royal Caribbean, Carnival Corporation, Booking Holdings, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings

Miami, Florida-based Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.

Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 20, 2019

Litigation

On August 27, 2019, two lawsuits were filed against Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida under Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, also known as the Helms-Burton Act. The complaint filed by Havana Docks Corporation alleges it holds an interest in the Havana Cruise Port Terminal and the complaint filed by Javier Garcia-Bengochea alleges that he holds an interest in the Port of Santiago, Cuba, both of which were expropriated by the Cuban Government. The complaints further allege that Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. trafficked in those properties by embarking and disembarking passengers at these facilities. The plaintiffs seek all available statutory remedies, including the value of the expropriated property, plus interest, treble damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. filed its answer to each complaint on October 4, 2019. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the claims, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against them. We believe that it is unlikely that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse impact to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, the outcome of litigation is inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties, and there can be no assurances that the final outcome of this case will not be material. We are routinely involved in claims typical within the cruise vacation industry. The majority of these claims are covered by insurance. Although the outcome of any litigation is inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties, we believe it is unlikely that the outcome of such claims, net of expected insurance recoveries, will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Effective June 5th, 2019, we stopped sailings to Cuba as the U.S government rescinded authorized travel to Cuba under the People-to-People program and prohibited travel to Cuba via cruise ships. The estimated negative impact resulting from this regulatory change, primarily due to changes in itineraries, is approximately $0.13 and $0.16 per share on a diluted basis to our Net Income attributable to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively.

an increase of $167.8 million in ticket prices primarily driven by the improvement in our ticket price on a per passenger basis due to the addition of Silversea Cruises to our fleet in the second half of 2018, the additions of Spectrum of the Seas and Celebrity Edge and higher pricing on our Caribbean sailings, net of the negative impact to our ticket price on a per passenger basis resulting from itinerary changes related to the travel restrictions to Cuba.

an increase of $524.5 million in ticket prices primarily driven by the improvement in our ticket price on a per passenger basis due to the addition of Silversea Cruises to our fleet in the second half of 2018, the additions of Spectrum of the Seas, Symphony of the Seas, Azamara Pursuit and Celebrity Edge, and higher pricing on our Caribbean and Asia/Pacific sailings, net of the negative impact to our ticket price on a per passenger basis resulting from itinerary changes related to the travel restrictions to Cuba.

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On August 27, 2019, two lawsuits were filed against Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida under Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, also known as the Helms-Burton Act. The complaint filed by Havana Docks Corporation alleges it holds an interest in the Havana Cruise Port Terminal and the complaint filed by Javier Garcia-Bengochea alleges that he holds an interest in the Port of Santiago, Cuba, both of which were expropriated by the Cuban Government. The

complaints further allege that Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. trafficked in those properties by embarking and disembarking passengers at these facilities. The plaintiffs seek all available statutory remedies, including the value of the expropriated property, plus interest, treble damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. filed its answer to each complaint on October 4, 2019. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the claims, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against them. We believe that it is unlikely that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse impact to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, the outcome of litigation is inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties, and there can be no assurances that the final outcome of this case will not be material.

Changes in U.S. foreign travel policy may affect our results of operations.

Changes in U.S. foreign policy could result in the imposition of travel restrictions or travel bans on U.S. persons to certain countries or result in the imposition of U.S. rules, regulations or legislation that could expose us to penalties or claims of monetary damages. The timing and scope of these changes are unpredictable, and they could cause us to cancel scheduled sailings, possibly on short notice, or could result in possible litigation against us. This, in turn, could decrease our revenue, increase our operating costs and otherwise impair our profitability. For instance, in June 2019, the U.S. government announced that cruise ships would no longer be allowed to travel between the U.S. and Cuba. This required us to change our high yielding Cuba sailings on short notice which impacted our earnings. Moreover, in May 2019, the U.S. government activated Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Solidarity (Libertad) Act of 1996, popularly known as the Helms-Burton Act. This allowed certain individuals whose property was confiscated by the Cuban government to sue in U.S. courts anyone who "traffics" in the property in question. The activation of Title III has resulted in litigation against us and others in the tourism industry.

“Sanctioned Country” means, at any time, a country, region or territory which is itself the subject or target of any Sanctions (at the time of this Agreement, Crimea, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria).

Miami, Florida-based Carnival Corporation

Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending August 31, 2019

NOTE 4 – Contingencies

Litigation

On May 2, 2019, two lawsuits were filed against Carnival Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida under Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, also known as the Helms-Burton Act. The complaint filed by Havana Docks Corporation alleges it holds an interest in the Havana Cruise Port Terminal and the complaint filed by Javier Garcia-Bengochea alleges that he holds an interest in the Port of Santiago, Cuba, both of which were expropriated by the Cuban Government. The complaints further allege that Carnival Cruise Line “trafficked” in those properties by embarking and disembarking passengers at these facilities. The plaintiffs seek all available statutory remedies, including the value of the expropriated property, plus interest, treble damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. The court denied our motion to dismiss the complaints filed by Havana Docks Corporation and Javier Garcia-Bengochea, on August 28, 2019 and August 26, 2019, respectively.

We believe we have meritorious defenses to the claims and intend to vigorously defend against them. We do not believe that it is likely that the outcome of these matters will be material, but litigation is inherently unpredictable and there can be no assurances that the final outcome of the case might not be material to our operating results or financial condition.

Additionally, in the normal course of our business, various claims and lawsuits have been filed or are pending against us. Most of these claims and lawsuits, or any settlement of claims and lawsuits, are covered by insurance and the maximum amount of our liability, net of any insurance recoverables, is typically limited to our self-insurance retention levels. We believe the ultimate outcome of these claims, lawsuits and settlements, as applicable, each and in the aggregate, will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Norwalk, Connecticut-based Booking Holdings Inc.

Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2019

Part II- Other Information

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The U.S. Government announced that, effective May 2, 2019, it will no longer suspend the right of private parties to bring litigation under Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Solidarity (Libertad) Act of 1996, popularly known as the Helms-Burton Act, allowing certain individuals whose property was confiscated by the Cuban government beginning in 1959 to sue anyone who "traffics" in the property in question in U.S. courts. We have received letters on behalf of various persons notifying us that they intend to sue us with respect to certain aspects of our business related to Cuba and seek remedies including the value of the expropriated property (generally, the applicable hotel), plus interest, treble damages, attorneys' fees and costs. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to any potential claims and that the results of any related litigation would not be material to our business, financial condition or results of operations.

However, litigation is uncertain and there is little judicial history or interpretation of the relevant claims and defenses, in particular as applied to businesses like ours. As a result, there can be no assurance that there will not be adverse outcome to any such litigation or that such an outcome would not result in an adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Miami, Florida-based Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2019

Quarterly Review

In June 2019, the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States Department of the Treasury removed the authorization for group people-to-people educational travel by U.S. persons to Cuba. As a result, we have stopped sailings to Cuba during the three months ended June 30, 2019. The estimated negative impact resulting from this regulatory change was approximately $0.06 to diluted EPS and Adjusted EPS for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2019. We expect a negative impact to diluted EPS and Adjusted EPS throughout the remainder of 2019 as a result of the cessation of cruises to Cuba.

Expense

On a Capacity Day basis, Net Cruise Cost increased 4.7% (5.5% on a Constant Currency basis) primarily due to an increase in marketing, general and administrative expenses and an increase due to the addition of Norwegian Bliss, costs associated with the cessation of cruises to Cuba and other ship operating costs.

On a Capacity Day basis, Net Cruise Cost increased 3.7% (4.3% on a Constant Currency basis) primarily due to an increase in marketing, general and administrative expenses and an increase due to the addition of Norwegian Bliss, costs associated with the cessation of cruises to Cuba and other ship operating costs.

Unavailability of ports of call may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

the authorization for group people-to-people educational travel by U.S. persons to Cuba. Concurrently, the United States Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security removed the authorization to travel for most non-commercial aircraft and all passenger and recreational vessels, including cruise ships, on temporary sojourn in Cuba. Combined, these rulings effectively eliminated the ability of cruise lines to offer cruise travel to Cuba. Limitations on the availability of ports of call or on the availability of shore excursions and other service providers at such ports have adversely affected our business, financial condition and results of operations in the past and could do so in the future.

The U.S. Government announced that, effective May 2, 2019, it will no longer suspend the right of private parties to bring litigation under Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Solidarity (Libertad) Act of 1996, popularly known as the Helms-Burton Act, allowing certain individuals whose property was confiscated by the Cuban government beginning in 1959 to sue anyone who "traffics" in the property in question in U.S. courts. Monetary and other claims may now be brought against us and other companies who have done business in Cuba. If these suits are successful, they could result in substantial monetary damages against the Company.

“Sanctioned Country” means, at any time, a country, region or territory which is itself the subject or target of comprehensive Sanctions (at the time of this Agreement, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria and Crimea).

In June 2019, the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States Department of the Treasury removed the authorization for group people-to-people educational travel by U.S. persons to Cuba. As a result, we have stopped sailings to Cuba during the three months ended June 30, 2019. The estimated negative impact resulting from this regulatory change was approximately $0.06 to diluted EPS and Adjusted EPS for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2019. We expect a negative impact to diluted EPS and Adjusted EPS throughout the remainder of 2019 as a result of the cessation of cruises to Cuba.