In London, China Bank Proceeds With Lawsuit Against Cuba For Potential US$1.3 Billion. Another Plaintiff In London Received Legal Fees From Cuba- That Lawsuit Continues In Litigation..

"FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CRF Makes Significant Progress in Legal Battle with Cuba

LONDON, UK — 28 June 2023 — CRF I Limited**, a significant holder of defaulted Cuban sovereign debt, today announced important progress in its ongoing legal battle with the Republic of Cuba and the Banco Nacional de Cuba (BNC).

1. Justice Cockerill Denies Cuba's Attempt to Appeal**: Justice Cockerill of the English High Court has rejected Cuba's appeal request in the litigation, affirming the court's original decision in favour of CRF I Limited (CRF). This decision is an important step forward for CRF, limiting Cuba's defensive options and significantly enhancing CRF's position in the case.

2. Cuba Faces Legal Action from ICBC**: In an unprecedented move, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, through ICBC Standard Bank has initiated legal proceedings against Cuba for approximately EUR1.1bn. This action follows significant pressure from CRF for ICBC to protect its interests as the custodian of CRF's Cuban assets. ICBC's decision to litigate against Cuba is a significant step forward for CRF and adds another dimension to Cuba's mounting legal challenges.

3. Cuba Compensates CRF for Legal Expenses**: In a recent development, the Cuban government has reimbursed CRF for the court ordered legal costs following CRF's initial victory in the UK High Court. This compensation acknowledges the validity of CRF's claims and is a positive indication for CRF and its investors.

CRF remains committed to protecting its interests and those of its investors. Despite the ongoing challenges, CRF continues to advocate for a fair resolution of the debt issue with the Cuban government.  But a negotiated outcome requires goodwill on both sides, and so far the Cuban side have declined to negotiate.

About CRF** CRF is an investment entity created specifically to invest in defaulted Cuban sovereign debt. It holds the largest known portfolio of such debt and is asserting its legal rights to recoup these debts in full. Contact Information- David Charters, Director, cuba.recovery@gmail.com

LINK TO MEDIA RELEASE IN PDF FORMAT

22-06-2023- Order by Judge for Permission/refusal to appeal before The Hon. Mrs Justice Cockerill   
19-04-2023- Order by Judge Order approved before The Hon. Mrs Justice Cockerill

LINK: Verdict By London Court In Cuba Debt Lawsuit: From Court- Money Remains Owed By Cuba, Cuba Lawfully Changed Assignment Process, Plaintiff Will Seek New Assignment. Another Year In Court? April 04, 2023

Court Judgement Excerpt: “CONCLUSIONS AND SERVICE OUT- 400. In conclusion: i) BNC consented on its own behalf to the assignment by ICBC to CRF of its rights and obligations under the Agreements; ii) It lacked capacity to consent on behalf of Cuba to the assignment by ICBC to CRF of its rights under the Guarantee; iii) Accordingly, the rights and obligations of ICBC under the Agreements were validly assigned to CRF, with the result that CRF is entitled to rely on the contractual provisions contained therein as to the jurisdiction of the English court, waiver of immunity and service of process.  401. I therefore find and declare that: i) BNC, on its own behalf, consented to the assignment of the debts represented by the Agreements by ICBC to CRF; ii) Accordingly, the debts represented by the Agreements have been validly assigned by ICBC to CRF; APPROVED JUDGMENT CRF v Banco 94 iii) The Court has jurisdiction to try the debt claims herein; iv) BNC is not immune from the jurisdiction of the Court pursuant to the SIA; and v) The conditions for the service of the Claim Form out of the jurisdiction upon BNC have been satisfied.”

LINK TO 3-PAGE APPROVED JUDGEMENT (4 April 2023)

LINK TO 94-PAGE APPROVED JUDGEMENT IN PDF FORMAT (4 April 2023)

London, UK, 4th April 2023
Cuba Defeated in English High Court by CRF
CRF I Limited v. Banco Nacional de Cuba and Republic of Cuba - CL-2020-000092 090

Following a landmark ruling by the English High Court in favour of CRF I Limited, Mr. David Charters, the Chairman of CRF provided a series of quotes for a press release, highlighting the company's commitment to ethical business practices and its intent to work closely with the Cuban government to reach a mutually beneficial solution.  Mr. Charters stated, "We are pleased that a Senior Judge in the English High Court has recognised CRF as a responsible creditor, and not a vulture fund, contrary to Cuban assertions. This decision reaffirms our commitment to conducting business in an ethical and responsible manner." 

Mr. Charters continued, "We have always maintained that the claims of bribery against CRF I Limited and our colleague Jeet Gordhandas were baseless, and we are pleased that this has been confirmed by a costs order against Cuba. We remain committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and transparency in our business dealings."  In response to a prior recent statement from Cuban Justice Minister Silvera, Mr. Charters welcomed Cuba's recognition of CRF as a legitimate creditor: "We welcome the statement from Minister Silvera that Cuba will recognize our legitimate debts and legitimate creditors, as CRF is both. We look forward to working with the Cuban government to find a mutually beneficial solution." 

Emphasising CRF's commitment to supporting the Cuban economy, Mr. Charters added, "CRF remains committed to finding a solution with Cuba that has zero impact on its budget for at least 5 years, recognising the difficult economic situation the country is facing. We believe that a mutually beneficial solution can be reached through constructive dialogue and cooperation."  Addressing a technical point in the judgement, Mr. Charters concluded, "BNC was the Central Bank of Cuba and remains responsible for managing these unpaid Cuban debts. Cuba won a technical point in this judgement which we have already remedied and we do not expect this issue to impact the eventual final outcome, which is a complete victory for CRF."” 

"Further to our press release earlier this morning, please see below a further release by Rosenblatt: The Rosenblatt team - Harvey Rands, George Jackson, Madeleine Binkley and Tracy Tsao - is pleased to have obtained a landmark judgment establishing jurisdiction against Banco Nacional de Cuba in respect of Cuban sovereign debt held by their client CRF I Limited.  In judgment handed down yesterday, the Commercial Court held that CRF are a legitimate creditor of Cuban sovereign debt payable by Banco Nacional de Cuba, the former Cuban central bank, having agreed to an assignment of two debt positions from ICBC Standard Bank to CRF.  The court rejected Cuba’s contrived allegations both of bribery, and that CRF is a vulture fund. Cuba’s allegation of bribery was cynically maintained without foundation for two years before being dropped shortly before trial.  CRF may now proceed to a substantive trial to enforce recovery of the sovereign debt that it unequivocally owns. In the meantime, Banco Nacional de Cuba has been ordered to make a payment of £575,000 to CRF on account of costs.  The Republic of Cuba relied on Cuban law to establish that the Banco Nacional de Cuba could not consent to an assignment of Cuban sovereign debt on its behalf. Accordingly, CRF have now made an express request directly to the Republic of Cuba for consent to assign the underlying guarantees, which they have no ground to refuse in accordance with the judgment handed down.

Other Release Notes:  It's important to note that CRF has already re-filed and Cuba must accept the assignment or risk being deemed unreasonably withholding. Cuba has bought themselves 28 days.  CRF appears to be the clear winner in this situation, as it has a draft order for costs. This suggests that CRF has a strong case and is likely to come out on top.  Another important point to consider is that CRF is a bona fide creditor. This means that they have a legitimate claim to the funds in question, which strengthens their position in any legal proceedings.  Finally, it's worth noting that all creditors know exactly how to put Cuba in the crosshairs. This suggests that Cuba may face additional legal challenges in the future if they continue to withhold funds from CRF or other creditors. Ultimately, it's in Cuba's best interest to resolve this situation as quickly and fairly as possible."

Granma
Havana, Republic of Cuba
4 April 2023

República de Cuba gana pleito en Londres: CRF no es acreedor del Estado cubano
La sentencia acoge el planteamiento sostenido por la parte cubana durante el proceso y desestima la reclamación de CRF contra el Estado cubano


En audiencia desarrollada este martes 4 de abril (08.45 horas de Londres) en la Alta Corte de Inglaterra y Gales, la jueza Sara Cockerill notificó a los abogados de las partes la sentencia correspondiente a la demanda interpuesta por el fondo buitre CRF I Limited contra la República de Cuba y el Banco Nacional de Cuba (BNC).  La sentencia acoge el planteamiento sostenido por la parte cubana durante el proceso y desestima la reclamación de CRF contra el Estado cubano. La resolución judicial confirma que las irregularidades cometidas por funcionarios del BNC, sujetas a investigación penal primero y a sentencia judicial después, fueron motivos razonables para que el gobierno cubano negara su consentimiento en ceder la deuda a favor de CRF.  El documento afirma, tal como venía alegando la República de Cuba, que el BNC no cuenta con capacidad legal ni autoridad para representar al país. Ello ratifica que CRF es un extraño en los instrumentos financieros que reclamaba contra Cuba y no le asistía el derecho a establecer la demanda en Londres; la República de Cuba es, por tanto, inmune a la jurisdicción inglesa y no tiene obligación alguna de responder con su patrimonio ante esta demanda.  Como se ha explicado anteriormente, el objeto central del proceso judicial fue determinar si el tribunal inglés era competente para conocer la reclamación de CRF como acreedor del BNC y de la República de Cuba.  De acuerdo con la sentencia notificada esta mañana, CRF no es acreedor del Estado cubano, lo que significa que la República de Cuba queda fuera del pleito. En lo adelante el proceso continuará solamente contra el Banco Nacional de Cuba, quien tendrá derecho a establecer las reclamaciones que le permite la ley inglesa.  

Google Translate: “In a hearing held this Tuesday, April 4 (08:45 London time) at the High Court of England and Wales, Judge Sara Cockerill notified the lawyers for the parties of the judgment corresponding to the lawsuit filed by the vulture fund CRF I Limited against the Republic of Cuba and the National Bank of Cuba (BNC). The ruling accepts the approach sustained by the Cuban party during the process and dismisses the CRF claim against the Cuban State. The judicial resolution confirms that the irregularities committed by BNC officials, first subject to criminal investigation and later to a judicial sentence, were reasonable grounds for the Cuban government to deny its consent to assign the debt in favor of CRF. The document affirms, as the Republic of Cuba had been claiming, that the BNC does not have the legal capacity or authority to represent the country. This confirms that CRF is a stranger in the financial instruments that it claimed against Cuba and did not have the right to establish the claim in London; the Republic of Cuba is, therefore, immune to English jurisdiction and has no obligation to respond with its assets to this claim. As previously explained, the central purpose of the judicial process was to determine whether the English court was competent to hear the claim of CRF as a creditor of the BNC and of the Republic of Cuba. According to the sentence notified this morning, CRF is not a creditor of the Cuban State, which means that the Republic of Cuba is out of the lawsuit. From now on, the process will continue only against Banco Nacional de Cuba, who will have the right to establish the claims allowed by English law.”

LINK TO 94-PAGE APPROVED JUDGEMENT IN PDF FORMAT (4 April 2023)

On Monday, 23 January 2023, at 10:00 am in London, United Kingdom, an eight-day Jurisdiction Trial commenced with pre-reading for two days, 18 January 2023 and 19 January 2023.  The trial was held at the High Court of Justice, City Court House, Rolls Building, 7 Rolls Buildings, Fetter Ln, London EC4A 1NL. Presiding: Mrs. Justice Sara Cockerill 

CRF I Limited (Cayman Islands), V. Banco Nacional de Cuba, The Republic of Cuba.  High Court of Justice, Business And Property Courts Of England And Wales, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court [Part 7 Claim- General Commercial Contracts], Royal Courts of Justice. [CL-2020-000092 Filed 18 February 2020; Court Filing Fee £10,000.00 (approximately US$13,000.00].  

From Court Filing: “CRF is a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. It was established to invest in defaulted Cuban sovereign debt.  CRF gradually acquired a portfolio of Cuban sovereign debt which was valued in the total principal sum of EUR189 million by 31 March 2016, and EUR1,200 million by 26 November 2017.  The majority of that portfolio, and the part that is relevant to these proceedings, was settled by way of risk participation at ICBC.  That is a common arrangement in the sovereign debt market.”   

Rosenblatt (plaintiff)
Memery Crystal (plaintiff- firm merged with Rosenblatt)
7 King’s Bench Walk (plaintiff)
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher UK LLP (previously for plaintiff)
PCB Byrne LLP (defendant)
Essex Court Chambers (defendant)
Uria Menendez (defendant)
 

Links To Related Analyses 

Four Convicted Cubans Are Defense Witnesses In London Bank Trial; One From Prison. Actual Bribery No Longer Defense Strategy; Allegation Of Bribery Remains. Skeletons Tell All? January 18, 2023 

36 Months Of Litigation; US$5.8 Million On Attorneys By Cayman Islands-Based Plaintiff And Havana-Based Defendants, Now London Trial. KCs Lead Sides. Issues: Interpol Red Notice, Jurisdiction, Bribery Jan 13, 2023   

China-Owned Bank In London Sues Cuba Central Bank And Government Of Cuba. Either Sue For Custodian Account Holders Or Be Sued By Them? Embarrassing For Cuba To Be Sued By "Good Friend." December 21, 2021  

NOTE: On 28 May 2021, London, United Kingdom-based ICBC Standard Bank Plc filed a lawsuit against Banco Nacional de Cuba and the Government of the Republic of Cuba. The lawsuit (CL-2021-000343) was filed in the High Court of Justice, Commercial Court, Part 7 Claim, Central Commercial Contracts and Arrangements. ICBC Standard Bank Plc is represented by London, United Kingdom-based Herbert Smith Freehills LLP.  The defendants have no counsel listed.  The last update to the lawsuit was 22 November 2021.  The claim document has been completed, but has not been served.  No documents have been filed- and no documents could be filed for months.  LINK  Total amount of claim by ICBC Standard Bank Plc against Banco National de Cuba and Government of the Republic of Cuba is approximately 200 Million Euros (approximately US$224.8 million).  Total amount of interest is approximately 1 Billion Euros (approximately US$1.12 billion).  

Gibson Dunn & Crutcher (London) Represented Plaintiff In US$100 Million Lawsuit Against Cuba. Firm Represents Plaintiff In Libertad Act Lawsuits In Florida, New Jersey, Texas. China A Defendant. December 07, 2021  

UK Lawsuit Seeks US$100+ Million From Central Bank Of Cuba & Government Of Cuba. Four Countries. Three Banks.  Questions- Defining A "Loan" And Capacity To Contract. Read The 14 Court Filings. December 06, 2021

Milestone... With US$19 Million Purchases In April 2023, Cuba Has Purchased US$7 Billion In Agricultural Commodities And Food Products From U.S.; Exports Up 6.4% In April 2023; Up 1.1% Year-To-Year.

Some of the surprises thus far in 2023- the Republic of Cuba has imported from the United States: US$228,542.00 in milk products (powdered, condensed); US$1,029,008.00 in coffee products (not roasted, roasted, organic, not organic, caffeinated, not caffeinated); US$372,958.00 in waffles and wafers; US$674,864.00 in cookies and sweet biscuits; and US$475,588.00 in mixed condiments.

ECONOMIC EYE ON CUBA©
June 2023

April 2023 Ag/Food Exports To Cuba Increase 6.4%- 1
61st Of 218 April 2023 U.S. Food/Ag Export Markets- 2
Year-To-Year Exports Increase 1.1%- 2
Cuba Ranked 57th Of U.S. 2023 Ag/Food Export Markets- 2
April 2023 Healthcare Product Exports US$185,987.00- 2
April 2023 Humanitarian Donations US$2,374,739.00- 3
Obama Administration Initiatives Exports Continue- 3
U.S. Port Export Data- 17

APRIL 2023 FOOD/AG EXPORTS TO CUBA INCREASE 6.4%- Exports of food products and agricultural commodities from the United States to the Republic of Cuba in April 2023 were US$19,248,734.00 compared to US$18,089,515.00 in April 2022 and US$32,133,008.00 in April 2021.  Exporters in April 2023 included Atlanta, Georgia-based AJC International (poultry); Atlanta, Georgia-based Intervision Foods (poultry); Norwell, Massachusetts-based Boston Agrex (poultry); Atlanta, Georgia-based Gerber Agri International (poultry); Little Rock, Arkansas-based Mountaire Farms (poultry); Miami, Florida-based Katapulk Marketplace (metals- copper, foodstuffs); Grove Services (poultry); Miami, Florida-based Arcross Group Corporation (paper, poultry); Chattanooga, Tennessee-based Koch Foods (fish, poultry); New York, New York-based Vima USA, Ltd. (poultry).

Judge Rules Against Expedia In Cuba Libertad Act Title III Lawsuit. Next Is Discovery Process- Which Harmed Cruise Lines And Helped Plaintiffs Obtain US$450,924,908.82 Verdict.

CENTRAL SANTA LUCIA, L.C., PLAINTIFF, V. EXPEDIA GROUP, INC., DEFENDANT. (1:22-CV-00367; Delaware District)
Cross & Simon, LLC (plaintiff)
Berliner Corcoran & Rowe LLP (plaintiff)
Fields LLC (plaintiff)
Ballard Spahr LLP (defendant)

Order (6/22/23)
Complaint (3/22/22)
Link To Libertad Act Lawsuit Filing Statistics

Excerpts From Order 

Defendant Expedia Group Inc. has moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by Central Santa Lucia, L.C. (CSL). D.I. 23. Expedia contends that I should dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b){l) because CSL has not suffered any actual, concrete injury and therefore lacks standing under Article III of the Constitution. D.I. 24 at 1. Alternatively, Expedia argues that the Amended Complaint should be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. 

I reject Expedia's lack-of-standing argument for the reasons stated in Glen v. American Airlines, Inc. (Glen[), 7 F.4th 331,334 (5th Cir. 2021), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 863 (2022). See also Glen v. Trip Advisor, LLC (Glenn II), 2022 WL 3538221, at *2 (3d Cir. Aug. 18, 2022) ("agree[ing] with the Fifth Circuit [in Glen 1] that the harm Glen alleges-namely, [Defendants'] wrongfully profiting from his usurped properties-'bears a close relationship to unjust enrichment, which has indisputable common-law roots"'), cert. denied, 143 S. Ct. 737 (2023). I also reject the three arguments Expedia makes to justify its request for dismissal of the Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b )( 6). 

Excerpts From Observation By Attorney 

“Chief Judge of the Delaware U.S. District Court, ruled fifteen months after Expedia filed its Amended Motion to Dismiss Central Santa Lucía, L.C.'s (CSLLC) Amended Complaint.  The judge denied the Motion to Dismiss.  The case now will move into the more costly and exhaustive discovery phase.  Judge Colm Felix Connolly found that CSLLC has in fact suffered real constitutionally cognizable injury from Expedia’s trafficking, necessarily akin to the common law cause of action of unjust enrichment.  Connolly found unpersuasive Expedia's argument that CSLLC individual members are merely the descendants of the old predecessor Cuban entities owners, and not the actual individual owners of the confiscated and trafficked in lands.  Connolly found that Title III does not require that CSLLC's owners have been U.S. citizens at the time that their property was confiscated by the regime, given the statute’s well-established elaborate dual tracks for both certified claimants and Cuban-Americans.  Connolly found that CSLLC had fully complied with the statutorily mandated trafficking notice to Expedia under Title III's highly specific requirement.  Connolly disagreed with Expedia's argument that its tourist bookings to CSLLC's all-inclusive hotels are exempted from liability by Title III's "incident to lawful travel" exception, since it is by no means clear that these consisted of anything other than embargo-prohibited tourist travel.”

Excerpts From Complaint 

Central Santa Lucia brings this action to recover damages and interest under the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, codified at 22 U.S.C. § 6021, et seq. (the “Helms-Burton Act” or “Act”) against Expedia for trafficking in property that was confiscated by the Cuban Government on or after January 1, 1959, and as to which Central Santa Lucia owns claims. 

The Confiscated Property includes real property located in or near Holguin province, Cuba that, until it was confiscated by the Cuban government in 1960, was owned by Santa Lucia Company, S.A., a Cuban corporation. The Confiscated Property consists of Santa Lucia Company, S.A. and approximately 102,300 acres of land, including thirty-five miles of oceanfront property that in some parts extended 8 miles inland. The following beaches (as they are currently known) are located on the Confiscated Property: Playa Blanca; Playa Pesquero; Playa Yuraguanal; Playa Esmeralda; and Playa Guardalavaca. 

A number of luxury hotels are currently located on the Confiscated Property including, but not limited to: Hotel Brisas Guardalavaca; Club Amigo Atlantico-Guardalavaca; Paradisus Rio de Oro; Sol Rio de Luna y Mares; Hotel Turquesa Holguin; Fiesta Americana Costa Verde; Hotel Playa Costa Verde; Playa Pesquero Resort Suite and Spa Hotel; Iberostar Selection Holquin; Villa Don Lino; Memories Holquin; and the Iberostar Selection Almirante. 

Under the agency model, Expedia Group facilitates travel bookings and acts as the agent in the transaction, passing reservations booked by the traveler to the relevant travel provider with Expedia Group receiving commissions or ticketing fees from the travel supplier and/or the traveler. Customers pay at the time of stay under this model, referred to as “Hotel Collect.” The agency model accounted for 24% of Expedia Group’s revenue in 2020. 

On May 23, 2017, Expedia Group announced that it had started offering online booking for hotels in Cuba. Veronica Vega, Expedia Area Manager for the Caribbean, stated that, “I see a lot of potential. We are talking about the largest country in the Caribbean with significant hotel expansion plans,” and that, “We are very excited about being able to facilitate travel and give people the independence to select their itinerary.” 1 57. Expedia Group entered into a settlement agreement with the Office of Foreign Assets Controls (“OFAC”) on May 17, 2019, regarding 2,221 potentially non-compliant Cubarelated travel transactions that occurred between 2011-2014. 

Expedia Group websites still facilitate online booking for hotels in Cuba and Expedia Group has never announced a withdrawal from the Cuban market. 62. Expedia Group websites advertise hotels on the Confiscated Property and enable the hotels, Grupo de Administración Empresarial S.A. (“GAESA”), and the Cuban government to normalize the appearance of the Cuban military’s involvement in the tourism and hotel industry in Cuba.2 63. Expedia Group websites facilitate the payment of hard currency to the Cuban government and military, including GAESA. 

Expedia Group is profiting from trafficking in the Confiscated Property by or through its retail brands that advertise, publicize, and/or facilitate the booking of rooms at hotel properties in Holguin province. 74. Expedia Group does not list hotels on the Expedia Group websites for charitable purposes. 

Links To Related Posts 

44th Libertad Act Lawsuit Filed. Plaintiffs Suing Melia Hotels In Spain Now Suing Expedia In U.S. "Expedia Group does not list hotels on the Expedia Group websites for charitable purposes." March 25, 2022

Expedia Asks U.S. Supreme Court (Justice Clarence Thomas) To Reverse Court Of Appeals Decision In Libertad Act Lawsuit. Previous Attempts By Other Plaintiffs Have Been Unsuccessful.

MARIO DEL VALLE, ENRIQUE FALLA, MARIO ECHEVARRIA V. EXPEDIA, INC., HOTELS.COM L.P., HOTELS.COM GP, ORBITZ, LLC, BOOKING.COM B.V., BOOKING HOLDINGS INC.  Initial defendants were: TRIVAGO GMBH, BOOKING.COM B.V., GRUPO HOTELERO GRAN CARIBE, CORPORACION DE COMERCIO Y TURISMO INTERNACIONAL CUBANACAN S.A., GRUPO DE TURISMO GAVIOTA S.A., RAUL DOE I-5, AND MARIELA ROE 1-5, [1:19-cv-22619 Southern Florida District; 20-12407 11th Circuit Court of Appeals] 

Rivero Mestre LLP (plaintiff)
Manuel Vazquez, P.A. (plaintiff)
Baker & McKenzie, LLP (defendant)
Scott Douglass & McConnico (defendant)
Akerman (defendant)

Link: Letter To United States Supreme Court (5/01/23)
Link: On Petition(S) For Rehearing And Petition(S) For Rehearing En Banc (1/31/23)
Link: Opinion From United States Court Of Appeals For The Eleventh Circuit (11/22/22)
Link: Libertad Act Lawsuit Filing Statistics

Court of Appeals Docket #: 20-12407
Docketed: 06/24/2020     Termed: 11/22/2022
Nature of Suit: 3890 Other Statutory Actions
Mario Del Valle, et al v. Trivago GMBH, et al
Appeal From: Southern District of Florida
Fee Status: Fee Paid
Case Type Information: 1) Private Civil, 2) Federal Question, 3) -

Originating Court Information:
District: 113C-1 : 1:19-cv-22619-RNS
Civil Proceeding: Robert N.     Scola, Junior, U.S. District Judge
Date Filed: 06/24/2019
Date NOA Filed: 06/24/2020

05/06/2022- Supplemental Appellee's Letter Brief filed by Appellees EXPE, Hotels.com GP, LLC, Hotels.com L.P. and Orbitz, LLC. [20-12407] (ECF: David Shank)
05/10/2022- Received 4 paper copies of EBrief, filed by Appellees EXPE, Hotels.com GP, LLC, Hotels.com L.P. and Orbitz, LLC.
07/05/2022- Supplemental Authority filed by Appellees BKNG and Booking.com B.V.. [20-12407] (ECF: Michael Duffy)
11/22/2022- Opinion issued by court as to Appellants Mario Del Valle, Enrique Falla nd Angelo Pou. Decision: Reversed and Remanded. Opinion type: Published. Opinion method: Signed. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.
11/22/2022- Judgment entered as to Appellants Mario Del Valle, Enrique Falla and Angelo Pou.
12/13/2022- Petition for rehearing en banc (with panel rehearing) filed by Appellees EXPE, Hotels.com GP, LLC, Hotels.com L.P. and Orbitz, LLC. [20-12407] (ECF: David Shank)
12/14/2022- Received paper copies of E-PFR filed by Appellees EXPE, Hotels.com GP, LLC, Hotels.com L.P. and Orbitz, LLC.
01/31/2023- ORDER: The Petition(s) for Rehearing are DENIED and no Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled, the Petition(s) for Rehearing En Banc filed by Appellees EXPE, Hotels.com L.P., Hotels.com GP, LLC and Orbitz, LLC are DENIED.
02/08/23- Mandate issued as to Appellants Mario Del Valle, Enrique Falla and Angelo Pou.
05/01/2023- Extension for filing certiorari GRANTED by U.S. Supreme Court.

LINKS TO RELATED ANALYSES

Expedia's Response To Plaintiffs Using Libertad Act In Lawsuit: No Jurisdiction, No Standing, No Ownership March 25, 2020

Plaintiff Files Appeal Against Expedia In Libertad Act Lawsuit September 05, 2020

Plaintiff Files Appeal Against Expedia In Libertad Act Lawsuit September 05, 2020