Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals Is Not Preventing Havana Docks Corporation From Appealing To The United States Supreme Court

No. 23-10171- HAVANA DOCKS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross Appellant, versus ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE HOLDINGS, LTD., CARNIVAL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Lines, MSC CRUISES S.A. CO., MSC CRUISES (USA), INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants Cross Appellees. 

01/08/2025- REPLY to RESPONSE to [83] filed by Appellee Havana Docks Corporation. [23-10151] (ECF: Christopher Landau) [Entered: 01/08/2025 01:29 PM]

01/23/2025- ORDER: The motion of Havana Docks Corporation to stay the issuance of the mandate pending a petition for writ of certiorari is GRANTED to and including March 20, 2025... [82] [10366180-2] ENTERED FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION. (See attached order for complete text) [23-10151, 23-10171] [Entered: 01/23/2025 08:35 AM] 

“ORDER: The motion of Havana Docks Corporation to stay the issuance of the mandate pending a petition for writ of certiorari is GRANTED to and including March 20, 2025, the stay to continue in force until the final disposition of the case by the Supreme Court, provided that within the above-mentioned period there shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court the certificate of the Clerk of the Supreme Court that the certiorari petition has been filed. The Clerk shall issue the mandate upon the filing of a copy of an order of the Supreme Court denying the writ, or upon expiration of the stay granted herein, unless the above-mentioned certificate shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within that time."

Link: Reply In Support Of Motion For Order Granting Or Confirming The District Court’s Discretion To Address On Remand Costs Taxable In The District Court Under Federal Rule Of Appellate Procedure 39(E)

Link: Order Of The Court

Link To Related Analyses 

Cruise Lines Request 11th Circuit Court Of Appeals To Return Libertad Act Title III Lawsuit To District Court. Defendants Argue Supreme Court Unlikely To Agree To Hear Appeal By Plaintiff. Jan 3, 2025  

U.S. Ag/Food Exports To Cuba Increased 37.4% In November; Up 31.8% Year Thus Far. US$2.9 Million In Vehicle Exports. US$57.4 Million In Vehicle Exports Thus Far In 2024.

ECONOMIC EYE ON CUBA©
January 2025

November 2024 Ag/Food Exports To Cuba Increase 37.4% - 1
48th Of 223 November 2024 U.S. Food/Ag Export Markets- 2
Year-To-Year Exports Increase 31.8% - 2
Cuba Ranked 49th Of 223 U.S. Ag/Food Export Markets - 2
November 2024 Healthcare Product Exports US$176,419.00 - 2
November 2024 Humanitarian Donations US$6,350,097.00 - 3
Obama Administration Initiatives Exports Continue To Increase - 3
U.S. Port Export Data- 19


NOVEMBER 2024 FOOD/AG EXPORTS TO CUBA INCREASE 37.4% - Exports of food products and agricultural commodities from the United States to the Republic of Cuba in November 2024 were US$39,384,920.00 compared to US$28,643,992.00 in November 2023 and US$33,085,677.00 in November 2022.

The data contains information on exports from the United States to the Republic of Cuba- products within the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act (TSREEA) of 2000, Cuban Democracy Act (CDA) of 1992, and regulations implemented (1992 to present) for other products by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury and Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) of the United States Department of Commerce.

The TSREEA re-authorized the direct commercial (on a cash basis) export of food products (including branded food products) and agricultural commodities from the United States to the Republic of Cuba, irrespective of purpose. The TSREEA does not include healthcare products, which remain authorized and regulated by the CDA.

The data represents the U.S. Dollar value of product exported from the United States to the Republic of Cuba under the TSREEA and CDA. The data does not include transportation charges, bank charges, or other costs associated with exports; the government of the Republic of Cuba reports unverifiable data that includes transportation charges, bank charges, and other costs.

January 2024 through November 2024 TSREEA exports were US$391,962,167.00 compared to January 2023 through November 2023 TSREEA exports of US$297,377,457.00.

Total TSREEA exports since first deliveries in December 2001 exceed US$7,638,295,560.00

Other products exported from the United States to the Republic of Cuba in October 2024 include:  

Used Vehicle (1500cc-3000cc)- US$3,989,435.00  
Used Vehicle (1500cc-3000cc) 2024 Exports- US$48,733,037.00
New Vehicle (+3000cc) 2024 Exports- US$4,566,028.00

LINK TO COMPLETE REPORT (AWAITING PORT DATA)

LINK TO COMPLETE LIST OF PRODUCTS IN 2023 EXPORTED FROM THE UNITED STATES TO CUBA

In First Hours, President Trump Reverses President Biden's 14 January 2025 Cuba Decisions.

“Anyone foolish enough to believe President Trump would not reverse the decisions of President Biden believes that Captain Louis Renault in the movie ‘Casablanca’ did not know that gambling was happening at Rick's Cafe.”

The White House
Washington DC
20 January 2025

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: 

Section 1.  Purpose and Policy.  The previous administration has embedded deeply unpopular, inflationary, illegal, and radical practices within every agency and office of the Federal Government.  The injection of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) into our institutions has corrupted them by replacing hard work, merit, and equality with a divisive and dangerous preferential hierarchy.  Orders to open the borders have endangered the American people and dissolved Federal, State, and local resources that should be used to benefit the American people.  Climate extremism has exploded inflation and overburdened businesses with regulation.

To commence the policies that will make our Nation united, fair, safe, and prosperous again, it is the policy of the United States to restore common sense to the Federal Government and unleash the potential of the American citizen.  The revocations within this order will be the first of many steps the United States Federal Government will take to repair our institutions and our economy. 

Sec. 2.  Revocation of Orders and Actions.  The following executive actions are hereby revoked: 

The Presidential Memorandum of January 14, 2025 (Certification of Rescission of Cuba’s Designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism). 

The Presidential Memorandum of January 14, 2025 (Revocation of National Security Presidential Memorandum 5). 

From Politico: “Notably, the Trump administration did not reverse the Biden administration’s decision to suspend Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, a provision that was designed to allow Cuban exiles to file suit against Havana for property and assets seized during the Cuban Revolution but has since been mainly used by multinational corporations.”

  • “Suspension becomes effective fourteen days after notification to the United States Congress. The Biden-Harris Administration provided the notification on 14 January 2025 so the effective date would be 29 January 2025 (do not count the day of notification). The Trump-Vance Administration may rescind the suspension immediately upon notification to the United States Congress.”

Links To Related Analyses 

Certification of Rescission of Cuba’s Designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism Jan 14, 2025

Biden-Harris Administration Eliminates Cuba Restricted List. Companies Expect Trump-Vance Administration To Reinstate It. Jan 14, 2025

Biden-Harris Administration Suspends Cuba Lawsuits Using Title III Of Libertad Act Of 1996. Impact Limited. Jan 14, 2025

Cuba Using Word “Banned” Is Grossly Misleading. $400+ Million In Commodity/Food Exports, $50 Million In Vehicle Exports, Authorized Investment/Financing Into Private Companies Attests Jan 15, 2025  

Cuba Using Word “Banned” Is Grossly Misleading. $400+ Million In Commodity/Food Exports, $50 Million In Vehicle Exports, Authorized Investment/Financing Into Private Companies Attests

Cuba Government Statement Using Word “Banned” Is Grossly Misleading- As More Than US$400 Million In Agricultural Commodity/Food Product Exports In 2024, US$50 Million In Vehicle Exports In 2024, Authorized Investment/Financing Into Privately-Owned Companies Since 2022, And Bank Account Permissions Attests 

The Diaz-Canel-Valdes Mesa Administration (2018- ) unnecessarily embraces awkward and thus misleading sentence structure when describing the existence of commercial, economic, and financial connectivity with the private sector in the United States.     

  • On the other hand, U.S. citizens, companies and subsidiaries of U.S. corporations are banned from trading with Cuba or Cuban entities, with very restricted and regulated exceptions.” 

LINK TO COMPLETE LIST OF PRODUCTS IN 2023 EXPORTED FROM THE UNITED STATES TO CUBA 

Links To Related Analyses 

Biden-Harris Administration Approves First Equity Investment Since 1960 In A Private Cuban Company May 10, 2022 

With U.S. Government Authorization For First Direct Equity Investment Into A Private Company In Cuba, Here Is Important Context And Details.  About The Parties; About The Message. May 16, 2022      

Biden Administration Will Use Cuba's Authorization Of SMSE's As Means To Expand Support For Cuba Private Sector- U.S. Investments And Loans May Be Next June 02, 2021 

Coffee & Charcoal Have Been Imported From Cuba; U.S. Companies Want More. Agricultural Commodities/Food Products/Healthcare Products Have Been Exported To Cuba; U.S. Companies Want More. October 02, 2021 

In A First... Private Company In Cuba Wins US$85,004.63 Default Judgement Against Miami Food Exporter. Dec 28, 2024

OFAC Updates Reporting Requirement For Legal Services Payments Originating Outside Of The United States. Dec 21, 2024

Huddleston, Rhodes, Others In Letter To President Biden Ignore Reality About Cuba OFAC Licensing. Ill-Conceived. Il-Timed. Uninformed. Dec 21, 2024

Penicillin G Amidase Exported From U.S. To Cuba. October 2024 Ag/Food Exports Increase 161.2%. First Cane Sugar, Dog/Cat Food, Frozen Crustaceans, Coffee/Tea Makers, Cane Furniture, Forklifts Nov 14, 2024

Sorry, Cuba Deputy Foreign Minister- Chewing Gum Is Candy And Candy Is Exported From U.S. To Cuba- Along With Sugar, Chocolate, Puddings, Cookies, Waffles, Ice Cream, Peanut Butter, Tequila, Pet Food Nov 26, 2024

Why Is Cuba Deputy Foreign Minister Lying, Misleading, And Misstating Commercial Relationship With U.S.? Isn’t He Supposed To Encourage, Nurture, And Support It? Nov 24, 2024  

Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Havana, Republic of Cuba
15 January 2025

Statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Cuba

On January 14, 2025, the U.S. government announced the decision to: 1) remove Cuba from the State Department's list of countries that allegedly sponsor terrorism; 2) make use of the presidential prerogative to prevent legal action in U.S. courts regarding lawsuits filed under Title III of the Helms-Burton Act; and 3) eliminate the list of Cuban entities banned from engaging in financial transactions with U.S. citizens and institutions, which has had fallout on third countries.

Despite its limited nature, this is a right decision in line with the sustained and firm demand of the government and people of Cuba, and with the broad, emphatic and reiterated call of many governments, especially in Latin America and the Caribbean, Cubans living abroad, political, religious and social organizations, and countless political figures in the United States and other countries. The government of Cuba thanks everyone for their contribution and sensitivity.

This decision puts an end to specific coercive measures that, along with many others, cause serious damage to the Cuban economy, with severe effects on the population. This is and has been an issue in Cuba's official meetings with the U.S. government.

It is important to point out that the economic blockade and many of the dozens of coercive measures imposed since 2017 to reinforce it are still in effect and remain fully extraterritorial in nature, in violation of International Law and the human rights of all Cubans.

To cite just a few examples, the illegal and aggressive persecution continues against fuel supplies that Cuba has a legitimate right to import. The cruel and absurd persecution of Cuba's legitimate international medical cooperation agreements with other countries continues, threatening to deprive millions of people of health services and limiting the potential of Cuba's public health system. Cuba's international financial transactions or those of anyone related to Cuba are still prohibited and subject to reprisals, and merchant ships docking in Cuba also remain under threat.

On the other hand, U.S. citizens, companies and subsidiaries of U.S. corporations are banned from trading with Cuba or Cuban entities, with very restricted and regulated exceptions.

Harassment, intimidation and threats against nationals from any country who intend to trade with or invest in Cuba continue to be official U.S. policy. Cuba is still a destination that the U.S. government prohibits its citizens from visiting.

The economic war remains and persists in posing the main obstacle to the development and recovery of the Cuban economy at a high human cost to the population, and continues to be a stimulus to emigrate.

The decision announced today by the United States corrects, in a very restricted way, aspects of a cruel and unjust policy. It occurs now, on the verge of a change of government, when it should have been made years ago as an elementary act of justice, without demanding anything in return or fabricating excuses to justify inaction, if doing the right thing were the intention. In order to exclude Cuba from the arbitrary list of State sponsors of terrorism, it should have been enough to acknowledge the truth, the total lack of reasons for such designation and the exemplary performance of our country in the fight against terrorism, which even U.S. government agencies have admitted.

It is known that the U.S. government could reverse in the future the measures adopted today, as it has done in the past through decisions revealing of the poor legitimacy, ethics, consistency and rightfulness in terms of its Cuba policy.

To do so, U.S. politicians do not usually refrain from arguing honest justifications as long as the vision described in 1960 by the then Assistant Secretary of State Lester Mallory and the goal that he described of subduing the Cubans by means of economic siege, misery, hunger and desperation remains in force. They would not justify anything as long as their government continues to be incapable of recognizing and accepting Cuba's right to self-determination and as long as it continues to be willing to assume the political cost of international isolation caused by its genocidal and illegal policy of economic asphyxiation against Cuba.

Cuba will keep fighting and denouncing this policy of economic warfare, the interference programs and the disinformation and smear campaigns financed every year with tens of millions of dollars from the U.S. federal budget. It will also remain willing to develop a relationship of respect with that country, based on dialogue and non-interference in each other's internal affairs, despite differences.

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

Biden-Harris Administration Eliminates Cuba Restricted List. Companies Expect Trump-Vance Administration To Reinstate It.

Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Steps to Support the Cuban People

Since the beginning of the Biden-Harris Administration, United States’ policy towards Cuba has focused on empowering the Cuban people to freely determine their own future, and advancing respect for human rights.  This singular purpose has guided our policies to reunify Cuban families, strengthen cultural and educational ties between Cuba and the United States, enable remittances to flow more freely to the Cuban people, and increase support for independent Cuban entrepreneurs.

In that spirit, we are taking several steps to support the Cuban people as part of an understanding with the Catholic Church under the leadership of Pope Francis and improve the livelihood of Cubans.  First, today we notified Congress that President Biden determined Cuba should no longer be designated as a State Sponsor of Terrorism.  Secondly, we notified Congress that the President issued a waiver for Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, otherwise known as the Libertad Act, for a period of six months.  Finally, President Biden rescinded the 2017 National Security Presidential Memorandum 5 on Cuba policy to eliminate the so-called “restricted list” and by extension the additional regulations on engagement by U.S. persons and entities with Cuban persons and entities, beyond that which is currently prescribed in U.S. legislation.  We have also been informed by the Catholic Church that the Cuban government will soon begin releasing a substantial number of political prisoners.

In taking these steps to bolster the ongoing dialogue between the government of Cuba and the Catholic Church, President Biden is also honoring the wisdom and counsel that has been provided to him by many world leaders, especially in Latin America, who have encouraged him to take these actions, on how best to advance the human rights of the Cuban people.  We take these steps in appreciation of the Catholic Church’s efforts to facilitate Cuba to take its own, constructive measures to restore liberty to its citizens and enable conditions that improve the livelihood of Cubans.

Biden-Harris Administration Suspends Cuba Lawsuits Using Title III Of Libertad Act Of 1996. Impact Limited.

Letter to the Chairmen and Chair of Certain Congressional Committees on the Suspension of the Right to Bring an Action Under Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996

Dear Mr. Chairman: (Dear Madam Chair:)

Consistent with section 306(c)(1)(B) of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-114) (the “Act”), I hereby determine that suspension for 6 months beyond January 29, 2025, of the right to bring an action under Title III of the Act is necessary to the national interests of the United States and will expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba.

Sincerely, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.

LINK TO LIBERTAD ACT TITLE III LAWSUIT FILING STATISTICS

Certification of Rescission of Cuba’s Designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism

January 14, 2025
Presidential Actions
Certification of Rescission of Cuba’s Designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism


Pursuant to the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and consistent with sections 1754(c) and 1768(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (50 U.S.C. 4813(c) and 4826(c)), I hereby certify with respect to the rescission of the determination of January 12, 2021, regarding Cuba that:  (i)  The Government of Cuba has not provided any support for international terrorism during the preceding 6-month period; and (ii)  The Government of Cuba has provided assurances that it will not support acts of international terrorism in the future.

This certification shall also satisfy the provisions of section 620A(c)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371(c)(2)), section 40(f)(1)(B) of the Arms Export Control Act, Public Law 90-629, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2780 (f)(1)(B)), and, to the extent applicable, section 6(j)(4)(B) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, Public Law 96-72, as amended (50 U.S.C. App.2405(j)), and as continued in effect by Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001.

JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.
THE WHITE HOUSE

Memorandum on the Revocation of National Security Presidential Memorandum 5

NATIONAL SECURITY MEMORANDUM/NSM-29
MEMORANDUM FOR THE VICE PRESIDENT
               THE SECRETARY OF STATE
               THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
               THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
               THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
               THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE
               THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY
               THE SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY
               THE ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OF STAFF
               THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF MANANGEMENT AND BUDGET
               THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
               THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO THE UNITED NATIONS
               THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
               The DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
               THE ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT FOR NATIONAL
                  SECURITY AFFAIRS
               THE COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT
               THE ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT FOR ECONOMIC
                  POLICY AND DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC COUNCIL
               THE ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND HOMELAND
                  SECURITY ADVISOR AND DEPUTY NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR
               THE CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS
               THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
               THE NATIONAL CYBER DIRECTOR
               THE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF
               THE DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
               THE DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF
                  INVESTIGATION
               THE DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL COUNTERTERRORISM CENTER
               THE DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY CENTER

SUBJECT: Revocation of National Security Presidential Memorandum 5

The United States maintains as the core objective of our policy the need for more freedom and democracy, improved respect for human rights, and increased free enterprise in Cuba.  Achieving these goals will require practical engagement with Cuba and the Cuban people beyond what is outlined in NSPM-5, and that takes into account recent developments in Cuba and the changing regional and global context. Accordingly, I hereby revoke NSPM-5.  

Section 1.  Revocation.  NSPM-5 is hereby revoked.  Accordingly, the Secretary of State shall immediately rescind the list developed in accordance with Section 3(a)(i) of NSPM-5, and the Secretary of the Treasury shall initiate a process to adjust current regulations as a result of this revocation of NSPM-5.  

Sec. 2.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.  (b)  This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.  (c)  This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.   

JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.

2nd Circuit Court Of Appeals Issues Setback In Libertad Act Title III Cuba Lawsuit Against Societe Generale And PNB Paribas.

“The principal issue on this consolidated appeal is whether 22 U.S.C. § 6084, the time bar provision of the Helms-Burton Act, Pub. L. No. 104-114, 110 Stat. 785 (1996), is a statute of repose or a statute of limitations.

Plaintiffs are successors-in-interest to assets seized by the Cuban regime many decades ago. In 1996, Congress created a private cause of action for United States nationals against "any person" who "traffics" in that "confiscated" property, 22 U.S.C. § 6082(a)(1)(A), by passing the Helms-Burton Act.  Yet, no action could be brought until May 2019 because, until then, every President used his authority under the Act to suspend the private right of action. See 22 U.S.C.§ 6085(c)(1)-(2). When the plaintiffs ultimately brought suit against BNP Paribas, S.A. and Societe Generale, S.A., the banks moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1 ), (2), and (6) on, inter alia, the grounds that the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing, that most of their allegations were time-barred under section 6084, and that the timely allegations failed to plausibly allege trafficking as defined by section 6023(13)(A).

For the reasons that follow, we conclude that (1) the plaintiffs have Article III standing, but (2) their allegations predating the filing of their respective complaints by two years or more are untimely because section 6084 is a statute of repose, and no basis for tolling the time bar exists, and (3) the remaining allegations fail to plausibly allege a violation of the Helms-Burton Act.  We therefore AFFIRM the judgments of the district courts.”

Link To 51-Page Court Opinion In PDF Format 

30th Libertad Act Title III Lawsuit Filed- This One Against Societe Generale And BNP Paribas, Both Of France, May Have Found Jurisdiction In New York December 02, 2020 

Societe Generale Wins Dismissal Of One Of Two Libertad Act Lawsuits. Plaintiff Expected To Appeal New York Ruling. January 05, 2022 

Societe Generale And BNP Paribas Argue That Plaintiffs Should Not "be exempted from the cut-off based on a purported policy argument they profess to glean from legislative history." May 11, 2021 

Societe Generale And BNP Paribas File Motion To Dismiss In Libertad Act Lawsuit- "Frustration Of Purpose Theory" Fails October 07, 2020

Cruise Lines Request 11th Circuit Court Of Appeals To Return Libertad Act Title III Lawsuit To District Court. Defendants Argue Supreme Court Unlikely To Agree To Hear Appeal By Plaintiff.

The four cruise line defendants in Libertad Act Title III lawsuit filed by Havana Docks Corporation have requested the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals not delay remanding the lawsuit to the United States District Court where it was filed. In December 2024, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request by Havana Docks Corporation for an en banc (full court) hearing.

10/22/2024    Judgment entered as to Appellant RCL in 23-10151, Appellant-Cross Appellee RCL in 23-10171. [23-10151, 23-10171
11/04/2024    Bill of costs filed by Attorney Paul D. Clement for Appellant RCL. [23-10151] (ECF: Paul Clement)
11/05/2024    Signed Approved Bill of costs filed by Attorney Paul D. Clement for Appellant RCL.
11/12/2024    Petition for rehearing en banc (with panel rehearing) filed by Appellee Havana Docks Corporation. [23-10151] (ECF: Christopher Landau)
11/13/2024    Received Four paper copies of E-PFR filed by Appellee-Cross Appellant Havana Docks Corporation in 23-10171.
12/20/2024    ORDER: The Petition(s) for Rehearing are DENIED and no Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled, the Petition(s) for Rehearing En Banc filed by Appellee Havana Docks Corporation are DENIED.
12/26/2024    MOTION to stay mandate filed by Havana Docks Corporation. Motion is Opposed. [82] [23-10151] (ECF: Christopher Landau)
12/31/2024    MOTION Order granting or confirming district court's discretion to address on remand costs taxable in the district court under Fed. R. App. P. 39(e) filed by Havana Docks Corporation. Motion is Opposed.
12/31/2024    RESPONSE to to stay mandate filed by Appellee Havana Docks Corporation [82] filed by Attorney Paul D. Clement for Appellant RCL. [23-10151] (ECF: Paul Clement)
01/02/2025    REPLY to RESPONSE to to stay mandate [82] filed by Appellee Havana Docks Corporation. [23-10151] (ECF: Christopher Landau)

Links To Filings
Reply In Support Of Motion To Stay The Mandate Pending
Joint Opposition To Motion To Stay The Mandate
Motion To Stay The Mandate Pending The Filing Of A Timely

11th Circuit Court Of Appeals Denies Rehearing In Havana Docks Libertad Act Lawsuit Against Four Cruise Lines. Next And Final Stop Would Be U.S. Supreme Court. Dec 22, 2024