3 Years Later, What Did NYS Taxpayers Receive From Governor Cuomo's Visit To Cuba?

Three Years Later…. What Did New York State Companies Get For Governor Cuomo’s Estimated US$150,000.00+ 27-Hour Visit To Cuba? 

Was a US$10,000.000 “Advance” Trip Necessary If A Consultant Was Paid US$25,000.00?

What’s Happened- Where’s The Yogurt And Milk And Healthcare Products?

Why No Representatives From PANYNJ, NYSDAM?

Governor Staff To Company Ratio Was More Than 2:1

Why Has He Ignored Financial Institutions?

Three years (1,095 days) ago, The Honorable Andrew Cuomo (D), Governor of the State of New York, embarked on a twenty-seven (27) hour quixotic journey to the Republic of Cuba with a foundation anchored far more upon his focus to be the “first” governor to visit the archipelago since the 17 December 2014 statements by President Barack Obama and President Raul Castro than by his role as the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) of the State of New York.  

To date, there have been no published reports of exports of products to the Republic of Cuba from the seven (7) companies participating in the 20 April 2015 to 21 April 2015 visit.

The Governor and his staff have embraced the “planting seeds” analogy… There are few seeds that do not create something within three years.

The planning process and follow-up to the April 2015 visit was the third-least transparent of the twenty-one (21) governors who visited the Republic of Cuba since 1999.  The visits by West Virginia Governor Earl Ray Tomblin and Mississippi Governor Phil Bryant were the least transparent.

Click Here For Complete Analysis In PDF Format

Cuomo.jpg

What Does The Inauguration In Havana Of Miguel Diaz-Canel Mean For U.S. Companies?

In the short-term to medium-term, there will be no new meaningful and sustainable commercial (export, import, provision of services, vertical direct foreign investment, horizontal direct foreign investment) opportunities for United States companies.

The transition and succession from the two Castro Administrations to the Diaz-Canel Administration absent of a robust presence by United States companies throughout the Republic of Cuba is a wretched reality.

United States statutes (Trading with the Enemy Act, Cuban Democracy Act, Libertad Act, and Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act) and regulations (primarily those through the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury and Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) of the United States Department of Commerce) prohibit and impede most practical overtures by United States companies towards the Republic of Cuba.

In addition to the impediments by the United States government, United States companies remain demonstrably hampered by constraints embraced by the government of the Republic of Cuba which constrict foreign exchange earnings, public sector development, and private sector development. 

There is no near-term or mid-term expectation that the thirty-plus (30+) non-travel-related companies, partnerships, and sole proprietorships who have expressed an interest in establishing a presence (office(s)/location(s)) in the Republic of Cuba will be authorized by the government of the Republic of Cuba.  These entities include law firms, accounting firms, consultancies, wholesale operations, retail establishments, hospitality operations, assembly facilities, manufacturing facilities, and restaurants.

The inauguration of the Trump Administration in January 2017 was not the singular impediment to the continued engagement by United States companies with the Republic of Cuba.

The inauguration of the Diaz-Canel Administration in April 2018 will not be the singular stimulant to the continued engagement by United States companies with the Republic of Cuba.

Important to note that President Canel is a civilian who wears a guayabera and, when required, a suit and tie.  His two predecessors never relinquished their military uniforms except in limited circumstances where protocol made epaulets unappealing.  While the “struggle” which his predecessors reminded the population with a uniform, President Canel’s choice of clothing emphasizes civilian leadership of the government.  That’s an important optic for management of United States companies. 

While the optics of the inauguration of a new president of the Republic of Cuba will visually reinforce a lack of a presence by United States companies, management of those companies who have or seek to introduce or re-introduce their products and services throughout the Republic of Cuba lament the willingness of the Obama Administration to resist implementing expansive regulations (direct correspondent banking, expanded list of imports, among others) and second Castro Administration to resist authorizing Republic of Cuba government-operated companies and Republic of Cuba nationals to make use of Obama Administration regulations.

Since 2015, the government of the Republic of Cuba has focused upon embracing a presence by United States-based companies whose mission is travel-related; where the transactions are primarily a provision of funds to the Republic of Cuba.  There have been limited opportunities granted for exports from the Republic of Cuba, coffee (indirect) and charcoal.  There is a power generation project with a non-public source of funding.  There are two equipment distributorships.  A healthcare product is in a clinical trial. 

The increased commercial presence in the Republic of Cuba by the government of the Russian Federation, government of the Russian Federation-controlled entities and companies, government of the People’s Republic of China, and government of the People’s Republic of China-controlled entities and companies has primarily been diffused through debt rescheduling, debt forgiveness, long-term government guaranteed payment terms, and donations.  Commercial logic has not been immune from a political calculus.

The government of the Republic of Cuba prefers to accept donations rather than accept invoices; not uncommon for governments of emerging economies and re-emerging economies.

For private-sector companies located throughout the seven (7) continents who may engage in commercial transactions with Republic of Cuba government-operated entities and companies, there is a marketplace in selling accounts receivables at a discount to third parties. 

The current (and soon-to-be) government of the Republic of Cuba prefers to engage in commercial transactions on a government-to-government basis, which tend to be less transparent and more available for restructuring.

Given the commercial, economic and political models of the Russian Federation, People’s Republic of China, and Republic of Cuba, both the government of the United States and United States-based companies will remain at a disadvantage until the 11.3 million citizens of the Republic of Cuba determine a commercial, economic and political transformation process within which has been defined the word “success” and to what level “success” may be achieved by an individual or owners of a commercial enterprise before conflicting with societal norms.

Attachments:

U.S. Companies With A Presence In Cuba

U.S. Companies Exporting To Cuba

Government Officials, Governors, Members of Congress Visiting Cuba

hosted2.ap.org.jpg

Vice President Pence Mentions Cuba At Summit Of The Americas In Lima, Peru

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Vice President
April 15, 2018

REMARKS BY VICE PRESIDENT PENCE AT FIRST PLENARY SESSION OF THE SUMMIT OF THE AMERICAS
Lima, Peru

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Secretary General Almagro, President Vizcarra, Presidents, Prime Ministers, and leaders from across the Western Hemisphere -- it is my great honor to join you today, as Vice President of the United States of America, at the 8th Summit of the Americas. 

And I bring greetings and great respect to each of you from the 45th President of the United States of America, President Donald Trump.

Excerpts....

And as all freedom-loving nations know as well, the greatest corruption of government is when the people lose their voice, their vote, their freedom, and their basic human rights under the heavy hand of dictatorship.  And the free nations of this conference are right to focus in renewed ways on ending dictatorship here in the New World. 

As we speak, a tired communist regime continues to impoverish its people and deny their most fundamental rights in Cuba.  The Castro regime has systematically sapped the wealth of a great nation and stolen the lives of a proud people.  Our administration has taken decisive action to stand with the Cuban people, and stand up to their oppressors. 

No longer will the United States fund Cuba’s military, security and intelligence services -- the core of that despotic regime.  And the United States will continue to support the Cuban people as they stand and call for freedom. 

But Cuba’s dictatorship has not only beset its own people, as we all well know -- with few exceptions in this room acknowledging that.  Cuba’s dictators have also sought to export their failed ideology across the wider region.  And as we speak, they are aiding and abetting the corrupt dictatorship in Venezuela. 

In Venezuela, as in Cuba, the tragedy of tyranny is on full display.  As this body knows well, Venezuela was one of our hemisphere’s richest nations once, and not too long ago. It is now among the poorest. Venezuela was also once a flourishing democracy.  It has now collapsed into dictatorship and tyranny.

WireAP_0c4142a2e63d458b86260f522d5b3c76_12x5_992.jpg

U.S. Food/Agricultural Product Exports To Cuba Increase 44%; Led By Poultry, Corn & Soybeans

ECONOMIC EYE ON CUBA©
April 2018

February 2018 Food/Ag Exports To Cuba Increased 44%- 1
February 2018 Healthcare Product Exports US$4,920.00- 2
February 2018 Humanitarian Donations US$419,869.00- 3
Obama Administration Initiatives Exports Continue To Increase- 3
U.S. Port Export Data- 15

FEBRUARY 2018 FOOD/AG EXPORTS TO CUBA INCREASED 44%- Exports of food products & agricultural commodities from the United States to the Republic of Cuba in February 2018 were US$26,122,933.00 compared to US$18,145,564.00 in February 2017 and US$17,847,747.00 in February 2016.

CLICK FOR COMPLETE REPORT IN PDF FORMAT

46.jpg