In Secret, Two Members Of United States House Of Representatives Visit Cuba.

Miami Herald
Miami, Florida
28 February 2024


“The group of about a dozen people was led by Democratic U.S. Reps. Pramila Jayapal of the state of Washington [7th District] and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota [5th District]. It included a congressional staffer from the office of California Rep. Barbara Lee’s office [12th District], sources with knowledge of the trip told the Miami Herald.”

United Sates Department of State
Washington DC
28 February 2024


QUESTION: There’s some reporting today about a CODEL from last week to Cuba, about ten Democratic members of the House. Did State facilitate any of that or do you have any visibility on that CODEL?
MR MILLER: We did not facilitate any meetings that they held. This is what I think you call a NODEL – the technical term.  Go ahead. [NODEL: Non-Delegation]
QUESTION: Thank you very much.
QUESTION: Really? So they had – they had absolutely no contact with the embassy?
MR MILLER: That’s not what I said. They may have had contact. That I’m not aware of. We did not facilitate any meetings they had with the Cuban Government.

Biden-Harris Administration Continues "National Emergency With Respect To Cuba..."

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO CUBA AND OF THE EMERGENCY AUTHORITY RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF THE ANCHORAGE AND MOVEMENT OF VESSELS
 
On March 1, 1996, by Proclamation 6867, a national emergency was declared to address the disturbance or threatened disturbance of international relations caused by the February 24, 1996, destruction by the Cuban government of two unarmed, United States-registered civilian aircraft in international airspace north of Cuba.  On February 26, 2004, by Proclamation 7757, the national emergency was expanded to deny monetary and material support to the Cuban government.  On February 24, 2016, by Proclamation 9398, and on February 22, 2018, by Proclamation 9699, the national emergency was further modified based on continued disturbances or threatened disturbances of the international relations of the United States related to Cuba.  The Cuban government has not demonstrated that it will refrain from the use of excessive force against United States vessels or aircraft that may engage in memorial activities or peaceful protest north of Cuba.

Further, the unauthorized entry of any United States-registered vessel into Cuban territorial waters continues to be detrimental to the foreign policy of the United States because such entry could facilitate a mass migration from Cuba.  It continues to be United States policy that a mass migration from Cuba would endanger United States national security by posing a disturbance or threatened disturbance of the international relations of the United States.

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect to Cuba and the emergency authority relating to the regulation of the anchorage and movement of vessels set out in Proclamation 6867, as amended by Proclamation 7757, Proclamation 9398, and Proclamation 9699.

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. 

JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
February 21, 2024.

National Association Of State Departments Of Agriculture Delegation Visits Cuba

State agriculture officials to address trade opportunities between the U.S and Cuba
February 16, 2024|Marketing & International Trade, News
Press Release


WHO: National Association of State Departments of Agriculture CEO, several NASDA members and a NASDA industry guest will host a press conference to discuss learned opportunities and challenges to agricultural trade between the U.S. and Cuba on Feb. 21, 2024, following a NASDA-led trade mission to the country.

Press Conference Participants: Ted McKinney, CEO, NASDA; Amanda Beal, Commissioner, Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry; Bryan Hurlburt, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Agriculture; Christy Clark, Director, Montana Department of Agriculture; Don Lamb, Director, Indiana State Department of Agriculture; Hugh Weathers, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Agriculture; Mike Strain, Commissioner, Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry; Thom Petersen, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Agriculture; Ernesto Baron, FTA International, USA Poultry and Egg Export Council Representative (NASDA industry guest)

WHERE & WHEN: The press conference will be held in Havana, Cuba, at the Grand Aston La Habana starting at 4:30pm ET.  

HOW: Please email Sarah Grace Fowler (Sarah.Fowler@nasda.org) by 5 p.m. ET Tuesday, Feb. 20 to attend.

WHAT: NASDA’s mission in visiting Cuba is to identify and address trade barriers for U.S. agricultural products, gain a better understanding of trade rules and regulations as well as the political and economic environment in order to strengthen the United States’ trade relationship with Cuba. While in-country, NASDA will meet with government officials, as well as industry and private sector leaders, to learn more about how the U.S. and Cuba can collaborate in the future. The delegation will consist of 13 people including NASDA members, an industry representative, supporting NASDA staff and Paul Johnson with FocusCuba. The delegation will be in-country Feb. 18-22, 2024.  Follow NASDA on Instagram, X, LinkedIn and Facebook to follow along with the NASDA delegation as they discuss and tour Cuban food and agricultural businesses.

NASDA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit association which represents the elected and appointed commissioners, secretaries and directors of the departments of agriculture in all 50 states and four U.S. territories. NASDA enhances American food and agricultural communities through policy, partnerships and public engagement. To learn more about NASDA, please visit www.nasda.org.

Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov Today Visits Cuba.  By Focusing Upon Expanding MSMEs, He Can Help Russia Make Money- And Help United States Capital Support MSMEs. Not A Perfect Alliance.

Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov Today Visits Cuba.  By Focusing Upon Expanding MSMEs, He Can Help Russia Make Money- And Help United States Capital Support MSMEs. 

Not Ideal, But Nothing Else Thus Far Has Nudged Government Of Cuba. 

On Monday, 19 February 2024, Sergei Lavrov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, will visit the Republic of Cuba, then travel to the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, and lastly to the Federative Republic of Brazil to attend a gathering of Foreign Ministers representing the G20 where he and Antony Blinken, United States Secretary of State, will have opportunities to converse with one another- should either of them choose to do so- and they should choose to do so

  • Group of Twenty (G20): Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, ​Republic of Korea​,​ Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, ​​​Turkiye, United Kingdom, United States. 

  • BRICS: Argentina, Brazil, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Iran, Russian Federation, China, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, United Arab Emirates.   

During the last two years, the government of the Russian Federation has yet again revisited the redevelopment of commercial, economic, financial, humanitarian, military, and political connectivity with the government of the Republic of Cuba and with Republic of Cuba government-operated companies.   

Boris Titov, Presidential Commissioner for Entrepreneurs’ Rights in the Russian Federation has been tasked with envisioning “the economic transformation of Cuba based on private companies.” 

To date, other than low-margin tourists from the Russian Federation visiting the Republic of Cuba, government-to-government donations, and provision of loans (which will undoubtedly soon require payment rescheduling, write-offs, or forgiveness as in previous decades), neither the government of the Russian Federation, taxpayers of the Russian Federation, Russian Federation government-owned companies, nor privately-owned companies in the Russian Federation have found demonstrably and sustainably profitable entry points in the Republic of Cuba. 

The Republic of Cuba remains a commercial, economic, and financial landscape of varying depths of quicksand for most who seek opportunities. 

Mr. Titov seems to be advocating for the government of the Republic of Cuba to continue- and do so more rapidly, an expansion of re-emerging micro, small and medium-size enterprises (MSMEs).   

Unfortunately, the government of the Republic of Cuba has an inconsistent tolerance not only for the existence of MSMEs, but a particular aversion to successful MSMEs and any exponential expansion of their numbers- along with increasing the commercial categories within which MSMEs may operate.    

Minister Lavrov should include in his agenda two focuses: First, convince the Diaz-Canel-Valdes Mesa Administration (2019- ) to immediately issue simple-to-understand regulations for the delivery from abroad of direct investment in and direct financing to a MSME.  Second, convince the Diaz-Canel-Valdes Mesa Administration to be positively inclined to test direct correspondent banking amongst a Republic of Cuba government-operated financial institution and a United Sates-based financial institution. 

  • The document, which could be on one 8-inch by 10-inch sheet of paper, would be electronically notarized and submitted to the financial institution where the private company maintained its operating checking account.  The information provided would include the source(s) and amount(s) of the investment, the source(s), and amount(s) of the financing.  Any changes to the investment terms or the financing terms would be provided to the financial institution.  That should be all that is required.  The private company would not be required to pay any fees other than the normal incoming electronic funds transfer fees.  The government of the Republic of Cuba must refrain from over-complicating the process; but, that is fundamental to its DNA, so politically a heavy lift.  This is because the primary political goal is to maintain equality- and a competitive private sector will, by its DNA, result in inequality. 

  • From the United States Department of State (1 December 2022): “Regarding direct correspondent banking, U.S. regulations do of course allow for U.S. banks to establish correspondent accounts in Cuba, but not the other way around, as you note.  Two-way direct correspondent banking would indeed likely decrease transactions costs.  However, it is our understanding that even if the United States were to authorize direct two-way correspondent banking, Cuban banks would not actually establish accounts in the United States due to outstanding legal judgements against the Cuban government that would freeze and collect any funds a state financial institution held in the United States.  Therefore, I expect you're unlikely to see direct correspondent banking on the horizon.”  Critical for the government of the Republic of Cuba to not be dissuaded by hypotheticals.  Create the direct corresponding account, test with authorized transfers (MSME funds, payments for agricultural commodities, food products, healthcare products, etc.) 

On 10 May 2022, the Biden-Harris Administration (2021- ) directed the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to issue the first license authorizing an entity subject to United States jurisdiction to deliver a direct equity investment in and authorizing direct financing to an officially registered privately-owned company (in the service sector) located in the Republic of Cuba and owned by a Republic of Cuba national.  The license application was submitted to the OFAC on 10 June 2021 and was issued by the OFAC on 10 May 2022. 

Despite three years of public and private indications, the Diaz-Canel-Valdes Mesa Administration has yet to do what was indicated would be authorized.  More than twenty-one (21) months since 10 May 2022 and the government of the Republic of Cuba has yet to publish regulations as to the process for MSMEs to receive from abroad direct investment and direct financing

Both the direct investment and direct financing could have been delivered on 11 May 2022- an envelope filled with currency; a bank transfer through a third country; a United States-based remittance forwarder- though would have required many small denomination transactions given transfer limitations.  However, doing so would have only served to reinforce the present rather than promote the future

Important to reiterate the objective of seeking the license from the OFAC.  The intention was never to quietly, secretly, implement its provisions.  The intention was to actively publicize the existence of the license from the OFAC so everyone would know about it- not only within the State of Florida, but throughout the Republic of Cuba.  That intention was achieved. 

But, there was a failure.  The government of the Republic of Cuba did not respond as expected.  Given the chronic commercial, economic, and financial undesirable results from decisions by the government of the Republic of Cuba, along with continuing changes to laws and regulations impacting MSMEs, there was an expectation of an immediate embrace for what the license from the OFAC could mean in terms delivering desperately required foreign exchange along with desperately required capital goods to redevelop manufacturing and assembly infrastructure.    

During the last twenty-one months, many individuals, and delegations of individuals of Cuban descent have traveled from the United States to the Republic of Cuba.  They meet with senior-level officials.  They report a consistent message- they do not know when or if the government of the Republic of Cuba will publish regulations as to the process for MSMEs to receive from abroad direct investment and direct financing. 

Quietly delivered messages from senior-level officials of the government of the Republic of Cuba conveyed that regulations were probable by the end of 2023.  That possibility too passed unfulfilled.   

The MSME for whom the license from the OFAC authorizes the delivery of direct investment and direct financing continues to wait for the delivery of funds.  Its management is frustrated.  The source of the funding and financing is frustrated.  Both appreciate, however, that implementing any decision absent specific regulatory compliance- required by the OFAC license and required by the government of the Republic of Cuba would only serve to reinforce the status quo:  Where funds are delivered directly from the United States and from the United States through third countries to the Republic of Cuba.  Thus far, the United States government does nothing to physically prevent it and the government of the Republic of Cuba does nothing to institutionalize, regulate it. 

Given the Biden-Harris Administration through licenses and authorizations by the OFAC and United States Department of State has re-authorized Denver, Colorado-based Western Union Company (2023 revenue approximately US$4.3 billion) to re-engage its currency funds transfer services with Cuba government-owned Orbit S.A. which in turn disperses funds from the United States to three Cuba government-owned banks, operational necessity has arrived for the OFAC to authorize Cuba government-owned banks to establish correspondent accounts with United States-based banks. 

The newly constituted Western Union Company currency funds transfer process which importantly delivers to three Cuba government-owned banks, added to the 2022 first license from the OFAC for the delivery of direct investment in and direct financing to a MSME in Cuba, now is essential for Cuba government-owned banks to have the opportunity, not requirement, but opportunity to have correspondent accounts with United States-based banks. 

In 2015, the Obama-Biden Administration (2009-2017) authorized United States-based financial institutions to have correspondent accounts with Republic of Cuba government-operated financial institutions, but did not authorize Republic of Cuba government-operated financial institutions to have correspondent accounts with United States-based financial institutions.  That decision was ridiculous then and remains even more so today. 

What is worse?  The initial decision in 2015 or the continued defense of the decision in 2023.  Particularly accounting for the Biden-Harris Administration focus upon supporting the re-emerging private sector in the Republic of Cuba… which requires support from the private sector in the United States… and the cost-effective, efficient, and transparent movement of funds- in two directions. 

Officials of the Biden-Harris Administration curiously question why the United States private sector does not embrace more fulsomely opportunities existing using general license provisions afforded by the OFAC and BIS.  Two answers:   

  • First, prior to and increasing since the Republic of Cuba was returned by the United States Department of State in January 2021 to the List of State Sponsors of Terrorism during the final days of the Trump-Pence Administration (2017-2021), United States-based companies and United States-based financial institutions remain hesitant to engage with transactions involving the Republic of Cuba.  The primary reasons: fear of running afoul of OFAC compliance requirements and the resulting OFAC financial penalties along with limited viable commercial opportunities provided in the Republic of Cuba. 

  • Second, the inability to transfer funds cost-effectively, efficiently, and transparently from the United States to the Republic of Cuba and from the Republic of Cuba to the United States.  The Obama-Biden Administration could have remedied the issue.  They chose not to.  The Biden-Harris Administration can remedy the issue.  They thus far choose not to.  Consistency of nonsensical decisions. 

U.S. Banks And Third Countries  

In 2015, Pompano Beach, Florida-based Stonegate Bank (2017 assets approximately US$2.9 billion) acquired accounts for the Embassy of the Republic of Cuba in Washington, DC, and the Permanent Mission of the Republic of Cuba to the United Nations in New York after Buffalo, New York-based M&T Bank Corporation (2023 assets approximately US$200 billion) notified the embassy and mission that it would no longer provide services due to challenges with regulatory compliance for many accounts with embassies and missions.    

Stonegate Bank in 2015 received a license from the OFAC for a correspondent account at Banco Internacional de Comercia SA (BICSA), a member of Republic of Cuba government-operated Grupo Nuevo Banca SA, created by Corporate Charter No. 49 in 1993 and commenced operation in 1994.    

  • According to the Republic of Cuba, “Its [BICSA] main activity is ‘enterprises’ bank’ carried through its central services and five branches based in the country’s capital, Santiago de Cuba and Villa Clara. It records all transactions in real time providing its customers with card and remote banking services while it is working on developing other methods of electronic banking.  Its institutional clients, national or foreign, receive a complete accounting and documentary service, while national entities also enjoy of significant volumes of credit facilities. Practically all sectors of the economy benefit from all this, such as that of agriculture, the food industry, the basic and light industries, transportation, aviation, fishing, construction, domestic and foreign trade, the iron and steel industry, sugar, informatics, communications and others with not only economic importance but also social, such as health, water supply, education, culture and sports.  Credit policy followed by the Bank is dictated in a collegiate way by its Credit Committee on the basis of a strict analysis and control in loan making.  The Bank counts on correspondents in the five continents, the majority are first class banks, mainly Europeans and Americans.  Equity capital of shareholders (Grupo Nueva Banca with the biggest share and Bancholding), near the USD95 millions with a balance ranging from 550 to 600 millions, make sure the Bank has a strong solvency ratio.”  

Without explanation the Obama-Biden Administration did not authorize BICSA under a license from the OFAC to have a correspondent account at Stonegate Bank, so Stonegate Bank routed transactions for approximately eighty (80) customers on a regular basis through Panama City, Panama-based Multibank (2019 assets approximately US$5 billion) which had dealings with the Republic of Cuba.  

In 2017, Conway, Arkansas-based Home BancShares (2023 assets approximately US$22.8 billion) through its subsidiary Centennial Bank purchased Stonegate Bank.  Stonegate Bank operations were absorbed into Centennial Bank.    

On 16 June 2020, Bogota, Colombia-based Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores SA (2023 assets approximately US$90.1 billion) reported that “On May 25th, Banco de Bogotá, through its subsidiary Leasing Bogotá S.A. Panamá, acquired 96.6% of the ordinary shares of Multi Financial Group [Multibank]. As part of the acquisition process, MFG’s operation in Cuba was closed and as part of the transaction. Grupo Aval complies with OFAC regulations and doesn't have transactional relationships with Cuba.”  

In June 2022, Elk Grove Village, Illinois-based Chicago, Illinois-based First American Bank (2023 assets approximately US$6 billion) acquired from Centennial Bank an operating account (and Republic of Cuba-focused branch personnel) for the Embassy of the Republic of Cuba in Washington, DC.  First American Bank has since ceased managing the account for the Embassy of the Republic of Cuba.  If BICSA is authorized by the OFAC to establish a correspondent account with First American Bank and if First American Bank were to establish a correspondent account with BICSA, there would be an opportunity for direct two-way fund transfers for authorized transactions (agricultural commodities, food products, healthcare products (medical equipment, medical instruments, medical supplies, pharmaceuticals, informational materials, (visa processing, overflight fees, landing fees, accommodation payments- Airbnb, etc.), remittances, and entrepreneurial activities (direct investment to and direct financing for privately-owned companies located in the Republic of Cuba, etc.).  This same scenario would apply to almost any United States-based financial institution.    

US$7+ Billion Through Third Countries 

For the period December 2001 through December 2024 (the most recently available trade data) from when the first agricultural commodity and food products were exported from the United States to the Republic of Cuba under provisions of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act (TSREEA) of 2000, the value delivered was approximately US$7,246,333,393.00.  

For the period 2003 through December 2023 (the most recently available trade data), the value of healthcare products (medical equipment, medical instruments, medical supplies, pharmaceuticals) delivered from the United States to the Republic of Cuba under provisions of the Cuban Democracy Act (CDA) of 1992 was approximately US$37,258,840.00.  

Additional tens of millions of United States Dollars in commercial payments to the Republic of Cuba for telecommunications, aircraft overflights, cargo, informational materials, artwork, aircraft landing, authorized travel, casa particulares (Airbnb), passport renewals, etc. 

All these funds moved not cost-effectively, efficiently, and transparently, but expensively, inefficiently, and absent transparency through third-country financial institutions.  Those third-country financial institutions receive a fee from each transaction.  Undeserved fees thus far on more than U$7 billion in funds. 

From OFAC Frequently Asked Questions  

742. Are financial institutions other than banks permitted to open correspondent accounts in Cuba?  Depository institutions, as defined in 31 CFR § 515.333, which include certain financial institutions other than banks, are permitted to open correspondent accounts at banks in Cuba. See 31 CFR § 515.584(a). Released on September 23, 2020    

743. Are Cuban banks permitted to open correspondent accounts at U.S. banks?  No. U.S. depository institutions are permitted to open correspondent accounts at Cuban banks located in Cuba and in third countries, and at foreign banks located in Cuba, but Cuban banks are not generally licensed to open such accounts at U.S. banks. See note to 31 CFR § 515.584(a). Released on November 8, 2017    

744. May correspondent accounts authorized pursuant to 31 CFR § 515.584(a) or used for transactions authorized by 31 CFR § 515.584(g) be established and maintained in U.S. dollars?  Yes. Correspondent accounts of depository institutions (as defined in 31 CFR § 515.333) at a financial institution that is a national of Cuba authorized pursuant to § 515.584(a) may be established and maintained in U.S. dollars. Such accounts may be used only for transactions that are authorized by or exempt from the CACR. Transactions necessary to establish and maintain such correspondent accounts —– such as originating, processing, and terminating authorized funds transfers in U.S. dollars —– are authorized.  Additionally, correspondent accounts used for transactions authorized by 31 CFR § 515.584(g), which permits banking institutions as defined in 31 CFR § 515.314(g) that are persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction to accept, process, and give credit to U.S. dollar monetary instruments presented indirectly by a financial institution that is a national of Cuba, may be denominated in U.S. dollars.  However, financial institutions that are nationals of Cuba remain prohibited from opening correspondent accounts at a U.S. financial institution. For a complete description of what these general licenses authorize and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.584(a) and (g). § 515.584 Certain financial transactions involving Cuba.  

  • Correspondent accounts. Depository institutions, as defined in § 515.333, are authorized to engage in all transactions necessary to establish and maintain correspondent accounts at a financial institution that is a national of Cuba, provided that such accounts are used only for transactions authorized pursuant to, or exempt from, this part.   

  • (g) Any banking institution, as defined in § 515.314, that is a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction is authorized to accept, process, and give value to U.S. dollar monetary instruments presented for processing and payment by a banking institution located in a third country that is not a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction or a Cuban national and that has received the U.S. dollar monetary instruments from a financial institution that is a national of Cuba for which it maintains a correspondent account and which received the U.S. dollar monetary instruments in connection with an underlying transaction that is authorized, exempt, or otherwise not prohibited by this part, such as dollars spent in Cuba by authorized travelers or a third-country transaction that is not prohibited by this part.  Note to paragraph (g): Correspondent accounts used for transactions authorized pursuant to § 515.584(g) may be denominated in U.S. dollars.” 

 LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

Article References

Cuba News Agency
Havana, Republic of Cuba
16 February 2024

Cuba's Chamber of Commerce for a closer link with the country's entrepreneurship


HAVANA, Cuba, Feb 16 (ACN) Ricardo Cabrisas Ruiz, deputy prime minister, called on the Cuban Chamber of Commerce (CCC) to work more closely and cohesively with all the actors of the business system, including MSMEs, in order to promote exports with added value and rational import substitutions, for the benefit of the country.

Cabrisas, also head of the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Foreign Investment (Mincex by its Spanish acronym), chaired at the Havana Convention Center the General Assembly of that institution, corresponding to 2023, in which his members from both the state and non-state sector presented experiences, difficulties, good practices and ideas to enrich the projections for the current year.  He highlighted the role that as part of the main tasks or challenges of the CCC, including the training of its members, can play the so-called clusters, a form of business organization by sectors or related activities, to seek common solutions based on science, technology and innovation, and based on the priorities of the nation and the orientation to target markets.

Presenting the report on the work carried out last year, in which the Chamber of Commerce celebrated its six decades in the midst of a war economy, Antonio Luis Carricarte Corona, its president, said that the institution participates in the process of updating the Cuban economic model, promotes exports of goods and services, import substitution and business opportunities with foreign capital.

He pointed out that currently the membership amounts to 1,226 companies, 303 of which are MSMEs, maintaining as one of the main objectives of the year, the attraction of new economic actors, given that the dynamics with the complement of the economy is still insufficient, which provides robustness to the business sector as a living system.  He also announced that in 2024 the CCC will focus its efforts towards the strengthening of relations with sectoral, branch and business associations that contribute to organize direct or reverse missions, exhibitions, forums, events, specialized fairs with projects, and intend to achieve results.

According to Carricarte, the difficult conditions that have characterized the socio-economic context of our country have not prevented the growing interest of foreign businessmen to participate in development programs and investment projects in Cuba.  During 2023, 24 business forums were held, seven of them direct and 17 inverse, where projects of the prioritized sectors of the Cuban economy, main exportable products and investment projects were presented.

Cuban News Agency
Havana, Republic of Cuba
30 January 2024

Cuban deputy PM updates implementation of measures to boost economy


HAVANA, Cuba, Jan 29 (ACN) Alejandro Gil, deputy prime minister and minister of economy and planning, presented to the Council of Ministers an update of the implementation schedule of the decisions approved as part of the Projections to correct distortions and boost the economy, accountability that will take place every month at the meeting of the highest government body.

As reported today by the Presidency of Cuba, so far the salary measures to stimulate the permanence of workers in the Health and Education sectors have been implemented, as well as the extension, until March 31, 2024, of the tariff exemptions for the importation of food and cleaning products by natural persons, without commercial character.  Likewise, the legal norms implementing the reduction of 50 % of the tariffs for the importation of raw materials and intermediate goods, and the increase of tariffs for the importation of tobacco, cigars, rums and spirits have been published in the Official Gazette.

It was learned at the meeting that in February it is planned to update the norms that will allow the reordering of local development projects; as well as to decentralize to the territorial governments the power to approve wholesale and retail prices of Natural and Traditional Medicine, of local dispensary and industrial elaboration.  Next month, progress will also be made in the presentation of proposals to restructure the exchange market, the intervention of the informal market and the control of the exchange rate in the country, which includes the determination of the exchange rate and the formation of prices.

Likewise, he said, emphasis will be placed on recovering remittance flows, encouraging their collection and studying the feasibility of new channels, platforms and the use of digital scenarios for remittances and bank transactions for collections and payments from abroad.  According to the Minister of Economy and Planning, it is a priority to implement the new mechanism for the allocation and management of cash flow for all economic actors, based on the distortions that exist today, in order to achieve a more harmonious functioning of the economy, and thus be able to advance in the autonomy of the state-owned company.

Gil Fernandez highlighted the scope of these Government Projections for 2024, and remarked that they are not fundamentally about price increases, but that they include the necessary impulse to productive activity, the increase of national production, exports and foreign currency income and macroeconomic stabilization.  It is not a matter of raising prices for the sake of raising them, he said, but of encouraging savings, making a more efficient use of resources, and seeking a fairer and more equitable distribution of the wealth generated.

In his presentation to the Council of Ministers of the "Plan of Actions for the Implementation of the Government's Projections to Correct Distortions and Re-launch the Economy", the Deputy Prime Minister pointed out that a key objective is to advance in the macroeconomic stabilization of the country.  "All the actions that are incorporated in the Government's Projections are linked to the Macroeconomic Stabilization Program. What we are doing in terms of price correction, he exemplified, has to do with macroeconomic stabilization, because it eliminates or reduces subsidies, and increases tax revenues.

When we are taking measures to promote and boost production, when we are transforming the exchange market, this has to do with the macroeconomic stabilization of the country, he stressed.  He explained that many of the projections will have more favorable impacts to the extent that more resources are available.

There are actions aimed at increasing the income needed to face a set of issues that we have to deal with in the economy. Having more fuel, more inputs for national production, necessarily involves foreign currency income, external income that must be encouraged, Gil Fernandez pointed out.  Among the objectives of the Government's projections, he added, is the increase of domestic production, with emphasis on the use of the installed capacities.  The measure to reduce tariffs on raw materials, inputs and intermediate goods, he illustrated, has to do precisely with encouraging the import of raw materials to link up with domestic industry. Today we have idle capacities in industry, and we are importing products that can be produced in Cuba.  The deputy prime minister also spoke of further developing social policy and protection mechanisms for individuals, families and households in vulnerable situations. "This makes explicit the distance between our government program and a neoliberal program".

It is also an essential objective to "reduce crime, corruption, illegalities and social indiscipline, through prevention and confrontation, affecting the causes and conditions that generate them". It is necessary to establish order, put an end to the softness, put a strong hand in what corresponds, and demand that what is established be complied with, he specified.

There are high impact projections, he pointed out, among them the mechanism for the allocation and management of foreign currency, which includes the resizing of the exchange market, which is transversal to the whole economy and we are going to face it this year; the transition from subsidizing products to subsidizing people, which implies a change in the distribution of wealth, fairer and more equitable; as well as the transformation of the institutional, regulatory and organizational environment of the economy.

Developing the economy, stressed the Deputy Prime Minister, "means, no more and no less, offering greater welfare to the people, and what we are doing is going in that direction. The worst risk, he said, would be in not changing and not transforming, "everything we are changing is going in the direction of greater welfare for our people".

Prime Minister Manuel Marrero Cruz defined as "a policy of the country" the Government's projections to correct distortions and re-drive the economy, which were first discussed and approved by the Political Bureau, then by the Central Committee Plenary and finally by the National Assembly with the full support of the National Assembly's deputies.

It is a process of transformation of the Government's work in the country, insisted Marrero Cruz, of strengthening its different structures, as the maximum responsible for the economic and social problems that have a direct impact on our population.

When we speak of re-boosting the economy, it is a profound call that goes far beyond waiting for fuels and foreign currency to fall from the sky, emphasized the Prime Minister.  The scenario is not going to change, it will be very complex, but we have to transform our economy, and we are encouraged by the examples of people, collectives, organizations that under these same complexities have done different things, have sought alternatives.

The Prime Minister referred to the role played by cadres and how they should be to face a war economy such as the one Cuba is going through: cadres who do not stop, who have the vocation to look for solutions, who do not set boundaries that prevent them from moving forward.  We have to review everything, he pointed out. Everything that is not going well must be reviewed, "but we must review it in order to look for solutions", he added.

We have said that we are going to go through complex times, Marrero Cruz recalled, that the measures are not going to transform the country's situation from one day to the next, "but they are the way out, of that we are sure, and solutions will be found little by little and the lights will be seen, but that will be when we all unite, and we all join together".

Cuba News Agency
Havana, Republic of Cuba
19 December 2023

We have the potential to move forward, Cuban president affirms


HAVANA, Cuba, Dec 18 (ACN) Miguel Diaz-Canel Bermudez, first secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba and president of the country, said today that despite the U.S. blockade and other objective problems, the country has the potential to overcome the difficulties and above all to produce more goods and services for the benefit of the people.

Cuban leader spoke at the session of the Economic Affairs Commission of the National Assembly of People's Power (ANPP), which analyzed the estimates for the closing of the economy in 2023 and the goals and objectives for 2024, based on the extensive information provided by Alejandro Gil Fernandez, deputy prime minister and head of economy and planning.

Diaz-Canel stressed that, although many do not consider it so, the intensified US blockade continues to be the main obstacle to the country's development, which is evidenced in the financial and energy persecutions, and in the consequences of Cuba's inclusion in the list of nations sponsoring terrorism.

What country can move forward without credits or bank loans and in the midst of other adverse conditions as is happening to Cuba, he asked, to clarify that mistakes have also been made internally, which will be discussed at all levels in order to rectify them, such as those related to the monetary order, the banking system and the approval of new economic actors.

In this regard, he pointed out that from now on this last task will be assumed by the municipalities, in order to incorporate the contribution of MSMEs and other forms of management to the Local Development Strategies.  Cuban president highlighted the State's efforts to stop inflation, which presupposes, above all, an increase in the production of goods and services.  He clarified that the tightened blockade, internal errors and the worsening of the world economic crisis with the well-known war conflicts have had an impact on the unfavorable results of the economy in 2023, but in the face of such challenges, creative resistance continues to be an important way out of the difficulties.

In this sense, Diaz-Canel pointed out the need to extend the good experiences and existing results in many producers and labor collectives, as he has verified in his tours through the provinces, an expression that we have potentialities but we must turn those exceptions into a rule.  He also said that only Socialism is capable of offering with social justice the wealth that we are capable of producing, for which he reiterated the conviction that with creative resistance we can overcome the blockade because we have many and good ones.

Cuba News Agency
Havana, Republic of Cuba
19 December 2023

Cuban parliamentarians advocate for the role of economic actors in territorial development


HAVANA, Cuba, Dec 18 (ACN) The Cuban deputies in the Commission for attention to the services of the National Assembly of People's Power called today for greater participation of new economic actors in the development of the territories where they are located, in the presence of Manuel Marrero Cruz, Cuban Prime Minister.

In a broad debate, they referred to the linkages between the state and non-state sectors as a possibility to take advantage of capacities in the industry, incorporate social objectives, promote national productions and identify new business opportunities.  Marrero Cruz, deputy for Gibara, in the eastern province of Holguin, asserted that the municipality is in the best conditions to make decisions in line with the economic and social development strategy; and that is one of the problems to correct.

He noted - along these lines - that it is hoped that governments will in the future invite people to create MSMEs linked to activities necessary for the territory, using the local potential in these forms of management.  That in 2024 all productive forces have the basic conditions and powers to produce more and increase the offers of goods and services, at reasonable prices, Marrero Cruz indicated.  Susel Alba Quintana, representative from the eastern province of Santiago de Cuba, addressed the urgency of the link between micro, small and medium-sized businesses (MSMEs) with the rise of each territory in an organized and planned way.

The social responsibility of a private company ranges from the salary of workers, prices, contributions to the community and care for the environment; but social responsibility is defined today by forms of management through spontaneity, Ines Vega, owner of a medium-sized company in Havana dedicated to hygiene and cleaning products and invited to the commission, pointed out.  Other topics focused the discussions of the deputies, among them, the issues that today hinder the work of non-state forms of management, the need to achieve cooperative production, the fluctuation of the workforce from one sector to another and the control system. with the participation of different bodies and organizations.  Cuba currently has more than 9,900 MSMEs and non-agricultural cooperatives, which have 262,000 employees, 25 % of them under 35 years of age.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Moscow, Russian Federation
18 February 2024
 
Press release on Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s upcoming visit to the Republic of Cuba


On February 19, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov will visit the Republic of Cuba.

Sergey Lavrov is scheduled to meet with the President of the Republic of Cuba Miguel Díaz-Canel y Bermudez and hold talks with the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cuba Bruno Rodríguez. The parties are expected to discuss a wide range of topical issues on the global and regional agenda, as well as various aspects of bilateral cooperation, including trade, economic, cultural, and humanitarian matters.

Cooperation with Cuba – Russia’s key partner in Latin America and the Caribbean, to which our country is bound by strong relations of friendship, solidarity, and mutual respect, which are not subject to external factors – is based on the Declaration on the Principles of Relations between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Cuba (1996), the Memorandum on the Principles of Strategic Cooperation (2009), as well as the Joint Statement of the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin and Chairman of the State Council and Council of Ministers of the Republic of Cuba Miguel Diaz-Canel y Bermudez on Common Approaches in International Affairs (2018) .

Bilateral political contacts are highly dynamic. In 2023, Prime Minister of Cuba Manuel Marrero Cruz paid an official visit to our country (June 6-17). President of the National Assembly of People’s Power of the Republic of Cuba Esteban Lazo took part in the Russia - Latin America International Parliamentary Conference held in Moscow (November 29 - December 2). On October 7, 2023, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin had a telephone conversation with President of the Republic of Cuba Miguel Díaz-Canel y Bermudez.

Meetings of foreign ministers are held on a regular basis. Russia-Cuba political consultations on international, regional, and bilateral issues are conducted on a regular basis. An inter-ministerial Plan of Political Consultations is also in place (the next one is for the period from 2023 to 2027, signed following the meeting between Sergey Lavrov and Bruno Rodríguez in New York in September 2022).

Along with the key aspects of political interaction, priority attention during the forthcoming meetings will be given to building up trade, economic and investment ties, including taking into account the full-fledged bilateral legal framework that has been developed over the past period to address this issue. The existing Intergovernmental Russian-Cuban Commission on Trade, Economic, Scientific, and Technical Cooperation plays a crucial role in this work.

A solid basis for deepening Russia-Cuba cooperation in the global arena is the closeness or coincidence of our positions on the main problems of the regional and global agenda, our commitment to strict compliance with the standards and principles of international law, first and foremost the UN Charter, and strengthening of the central role of the United Nations.
Cuba has traditionally supported Russia’s priorities at the UN General Assembly, in particular on countering the glorification of Nazism, confidence-building measures in outer space, particularly not being the first to deploy weapons in space, and international information security.

Moscow and Havana are in solidarity on the unacceptability of interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states, the categorical inadmissibility of the use of unilateral sanctions in violation of the UN Charter, and endeavour to work together to build a just multipolar world order based on genuine equality of states.

The Cuban leadership, despite the enormous pressure exerted on it by the “collective West”, openly declares that it was the United States that provoked the current Ukrainian crisis because of NATO’s expansion to our country’s borders and its irresponsible disregard of Russia’s decades-long justified demands for security guarantees. Cuba votes against major anti-Russian initiatives on international platforms.

Russia strongly supports the demands for an immediate end to Washington’s illegal trade, economic, and financial blockade of Cuba, and the removal of the country from the US State Department’s unilateral list of state sponsors of terrorism. We believe that the application of illegal sanctions against Havana, which is causing enormous damage to the island’s economy and restricts the natural rights of Cuban citizens to live in dignity and choose their own path of development, is contrary to the UN Charter fundamental principles and rules.

List Of Every Product Exported From U.S. To Cuba In 2023. U.S. Ag Commodity/Food Exports Up 4.2%- Including US$5.4 Million In Coffee. US$24 Million To MSMEs Including US$8 Million In Vehicles.

ECONOMIC EYE ON CUBA©
February 2024

December 2023 Ag/Food Exports To Cuba Increase 14.8% - 1
44th Of 227 December 2023 U.S. Food/Ag Export Markets- 2
Year-To-Year Exports Increase 4.2% - 2
Cuba Ranked 53rd Of 227 2023 U.S. Ag/Food Export Markets - 2
December 2023 Healthcare Product Exports US$58,472.00 - 2
2023 Healthcare Product Exports US$839,500.00 - 2
December 2023 Humanitarian Donations US$2,643,753.00 - 3
2023 Humanitarian Donations US$36,563,551.00 - 3
Obama Administration Initiatives Exports Continue To Increase - 3
U.S. Port Export Data- 19 (awaiting new port data; current data through November 2023)


DECEMBER 2023 FOOD/AG EXPORTS TO CUBA INCREASE 14.8% - Exports of food products and agricultural commodities from the United States to the Republic of Cuba in December 2023 were US$45,229,570.00 compared to US$39,393,828.00 in December 2022 and US$28,091,304.00 in December 2021.

2023 TSREEA exports were US$342,607,027.00 compared to 2022 TSREEA exports of US$328,536,988.00. 2023 ranked 10th in year total since first TSREEA exports in December 2001. Total TSREEA exports since first deliveries in December 2001 exceed: US$7,246,333,393.00.

Humanitarian Donations in 2023 were US$36,563,551.00 compared to US$30,083,306.00 in 2022, US$11,074,090.00 in 2021, and US$4,605,055.00 in 2021.

2023 (Product, U.S. Dollar Value, Percentage Of Total Exports)
1- Chicken Leg Quarters (Frozen); US$136,866,359.00; 43.6%
2- Chicken Meat (Frozen); US$93,942,602.00; 29.9%
3- Chicken Legs (Frozen); US$38,928,985.00; 12.4%
4- Preserved Chicken Meat; US$9,841,876.00; 3.1%
5- Coffee (Roasted/No Roasted/Organic/No Organic); US$5,467,101.00; 1.7%
6- Calcium Phosphates; US$4,573,013.00; 1.5%
7- Meat Of Swine (Frozen); US$4,031,078.00; 1.3%
8- Chicken Meat & Edible Offal (Frozen); US$3,045,932.00; 1.0%
9- Milk/Cream (Concentrated/Non, Sweetened); US$2,914,674.00; 1.0%
10- Meat of Swine (Processed, Frozen); US$2,116,222.00; .70%

Ten-Largest U.S. Agricultural Commodity/Food Product Exports To Cuba: US$301,727,842.00    
Total U.S. TSREEA Exports To Cuba: US$342,607,027.00    
10 Largest As % of TSREEA Exports To Cuba: 88.1%

Obama-Biden Administration (2009-2017) and Biden-Harris Administration (2021- ) initiatives focusing on re-emerging micro, small, and medium-size enterprises (MSMEs) in the Republic of Cuba continue to increase. For 2023, the value of related product exports from the United States to the Republic of Cuba was approximately US$24,163,312.00.

LINK TO COMPLETE LIST OF PRODUCTS IN 2023 EXPORTED FROM THE UNITED STATES TO CUBA

The data contains information on exports from the United States to the Republic of Cuba- products within the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act (TSREEA) of 2000, Cuban Democracy Act (CDA) of 1992, and regulations implemented (1992 to present) for other products by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury and Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) of the United States Department of Commerce.

The TSREEA re-authorized the direct commercial (on a cash basis) export of food products (including branded food products) and agricultural commodities from the United States to the Republic of Cuba, irrespective of purpose. The TSREEA does not include healthcare products, which remain authorized and regulated by the CDA.

The data represents the U.S. Dollar value of product exported from the United States to the Republic of Cuba under the TSREEA and CDA. The data does not include transportation charges, bank charges, or other costs associated with exports; the government of the Republic of Cuba reports unverifiable data that includes transportation charges, bank charges, and other costs.

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

Must Have Been A Brief Meeting.... U.S.-Cuba Law Enforcement Dialogue Reported This Morning; Readout At 11:25 AM

United States Department of State
Washington DC
7 February 2024

U.S. – Cuba Law Enforcement Dialogue

Office of the Spokesperson

On February 7, U.S. and Cuban officials met in Washington, D.C. to discuss law enforcement matters of bilateral interest under the U.S. – Cuba Law Enforcement Dialogue.

The U.S. – Cuba Law Enforcement Dialogue enhances the national security of the United States through improved law enforcement coordination, which enables the United States to better protect U.S. citizens and bring criminals to justice.   Establishing and increasing channels for law enforcement cooperation to address transnational threats also enhances U.S. advocacy for human rights.  The United States integrates advocacy for human rights and human rights protections into all interactions with the Cuban government.

The Departments of State, Homeland Security, and Justice co-chaired the dialogue for the United States.  Officials from the U.S. Embassy in Havana also participated.  This meeting was the sixth Law Enforcement Dialogue since 2015.

Engaging in these talks underscores the U.S. commitment to pursuing constructive discussions with the Government of Cuba where appropriate to advance U.S. interests.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Havana, Republic of Cuba
7 February 2024

Authorities from Cuba and the United States hold dialogue on law enforcement and enforcement Havana

Today, February 7, the authorities of the law enforcement and enforcement bodies of Cuba and the United States met in Washington DC, with the purpose of continuing the exchanges on cooperation to confront terrorism, the illicit trafficking of migrants and immigration fraud, drug trafficking, among other scourges that threaten the security of both countries. The meeting took place in a climate of respect and professionalism.

The Cuban delegation conveyed information and cooperation proposals to the US side on the activities of people living in the United States, identified by their links to terrorism, illegal human trafficking and other illicit activities. The realization of this exchange is an expression of the Cuban government's commitment to the fight against terrorism, and its determination to take all necessary steps to combat its perpetrators. It does not contradict the most absolute rejection of the unjustified and arbitrary inclusion of Cuba in the list published by the State Department of States that supposedly sponsor terrorism. This position was duly recorded at the meeting. Both delegations agreed that there are transnational crimes that threaten the security of both countries and that require cooperation to confront them.

They agreed to continue this dialogue and hold other technical meetings between the law enforcement agencies of the two countries to materialize bilateral cooperation. The Cuban delegation was made up of representatives of the Ministries of the Interior and Foreign Affairs, the Attorney General's Office and the General Customs of the Republic. The US side was made up of representatives from the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice and State. (Cubaminrex)

Celal Gunes | Anadolu Agency

Arrest Of "Super Mule" In Tampa For Illegally Transporting US$100,000.00 To U.S. From Cuba Not Surprising… May Have Transported US$4.5 Million In Last Nine Months.

Arrest Of Mirtza Ocana Of Tampa For Illegally Transporting US$100,000.00 To U.S. From Cuba Not Surprising… Mirtza May Have Imported US$4.5 Million In Last Nine Months. 

16 November 2020: “If Western Union Ends Remittance Services To Cuba, That Means A Return Of “Mules On Steroids”” 

Implementing Direct Correspondent Banking Would Mitigate This Type Of Illegal, Non-Transparent, Inefficient, and Unsafe Activity. 

Undermining Argument That U.S. Dollars Generated In Cuba Remain In Cuba 

United States Department of Justice- Middle District of Florida
Tampa, Florida
6 February 2024

“Tampa, Florida –United States Attorney Roger B. Handberg announces the arrest and filing of a criminal complaint charging Mirtza Ocana (38, Tampa) with smuggling over $100,000 of United States currency into the United States from Cuba. If convicted on all counts, Ocana faces a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison. 

According to the complaint, Ocana arrived at Tampa International Airport on an international flight from Cuba on February 5, 2024. She claimed that she did not have more than $10,000 on her person (a limit that would trigger reporting requirements), thus had nothing to declare. However, during a routine inspection of her luggage, agents from the Department of Homeland Security recovered approximately $30,000 in bulk cash concealed in three wrapped packages. Ocana then admitted that she flew from Cuba to Tampa two to three times per month to smuggle cash into the United States and that she knew that bringing bulk cash into the United States without reporting it was illegal. Agents searched Ocana and discovered an additional $70,000 in cash hidden in her clothes. Ocana’s flight history later revealed that she had flown from Cuba to Tampa 45 times since May 2023.

A complaint is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed one or more violations of federal criminal law, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless, and until, proven guilty.

This case is being investigated by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol. It will be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Michael J. Buchanan.” 

LINK TO COMPLETE FILED COMPLAINT

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

Links To Related Analyses 

If Western Union Ends Remittance Services To Cuba, That Means A Return Of “Mules On Steroids”- The Impact Could Cripple MIA November 16, 2020 

State Department, NSC, OFAC, BIS, USDA Don't Understand Requirements For Financial Plumbing To Function Efficiently.  They Excel In Creating, Maintaining, And Defending Clogs. May 16, 2023 

Biden Administration To Issue New/Revised MSME Policies. Reversing Trump Administration Decision But Not Obama Administration Decision. Bank Responsibility? OFAC Penalties? September 18, 2023 

Biden-Harris Administration Approves First Equity Investment Since 1960 In A Private Cuban Company May 10, 2022 

With U.S. Government Authorization For First Direct Equity Investment Into A Private Company In Cuba, Here Is Important Context And Details.  About The Parties; About The Message. May 16, 2022

USAID Administrator Samantha Power, A Former Journalist, Expected To Promote Transparency.  For 17 Months, USAID Refuses To Provide Information About PPE Deliveries To Cuba In 2022.

USAID Administrator Samantha Power, A Former Journalist, Is Expected To Promote Transparency. 

However, Now Nearing Seventeen Months And USAID Administrator Samantha Power Continues To Refuse To Provide Information About PPE Deliveries To Cuba In 2022. 

FOIA Filed 14 October 2022.  What Is USAID Hiding?  

USAID Did Permit Photograph For Media Promotion, But Refuses To Provide Details 

The lack of transparency by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) which operates under the auspice of the United States Department of State, is both destructive and malignant for the United States business community.  Executives equate transparency with guidance and support.  When the Biden-Harris Administration (2021- ) decides to provide Made-In-America (although origin has yet to be confirmed by USAID) firefighting equipment (PPE- Personal Protective Equipment) to the government of the Republic of Cuba, executives interpret the motivation in a positive manner.  The United States Embassy in Havana, Republic of Cuba, published images of the delivery presentation.  However, when USAID then refuses for seventeen (17) months to provide basic information about the delivered PPE- manufacturer, quantity, price, and critically the source of funding, the result is destructive because United States-based companies look to the transparency of the United States government as a primary indicator of whether engagement with the Republic of Cuba makes sense.  Lack of transparency equates to a STOP sign.  The malignancy develops because executives speak with one another- and in this instance share a cautionary tale rather than an opportunity for engagement.

La Raza Network- US Embassy Cuba

  • 26 January 2024:My apologies; the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) regrets the delay in responding to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.  Please be advised that FOIA No. X-XXXXX-XX has been escalated and is still being processed.  Unfortunately, USAID is experiencing a backlog of FOIA requests.  The FOIA office will provide you with another status update and an estimated time of completion on or before March 29, 2024.  Thank you for your continued patience.”   

  • 6 December 2023:The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) regrets the delay in responding to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.  Please be advised that FOIA No. X-XXXXX-XX has been escalated and is still being processed.  Unfortunately, USAID is experiencing a backlog of FOIA requests.  The FOIA office will provide you with another status update and an estimated time of completion on or before December 29, 2023.  Thank you for your continued patience.”   

  • 24 August 2023:Thank you for your continued patience while we process your FOIA request. Unfortunately, USAID is experiencing a backlog of FOIA requests.  Please know that USAID management is very committed to providing responses to FOIA requests and remedying the FOIA backlog.  I will provide you with an update on or before September 5, 2023.” 

  • 16 August 2023:Thank you for your continued patience while we process your FOIA request. Unfortunately, USAID is experiencing a backlog of FOIA requests.  Please know that USAID management is very committed to providing responses to FOIA requests and remedying the FOIA backlog.  I will provide you with an update on or before August 23, 2023.” 

  • 17 July 2023:Thank you for your continued patience. Additional search time is needed to complete your request.  I will provide you with an update on or before July 31, 2023.” 

  • 16 June 2023:Greetings, Thank you for your continued patience. Additional search time is needed to complete your request.  I will provide you with an update on or before June 30, 2023.”  

  • 24 May 2023:Greetings, We are still working on your FOIA request and should have a response for you by June 14, 2023.” 

“This acknowledges receipt of your October 14, 2022, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).  Specifically, you requested all information about the following delivery in August 2022/September 2022/October 2022 from USAID of PPE to Cuba: 1) How was the donation delivered- air, vessel? 2) What is the brand/manufacturer of the PPE? 3) Was the delivery directly to a Republic of Cuba government-operated entity or through first the U.S. Embassy in Havana? 4) What was the U.S. Dollar value of the delivered 43 sets of PPE? 5) What is the U.S. Dollar value of the 57 sets of PPE to be delivered? 6) Did USAID use its government funding for the purchase(s)?   (Date Range for Record Search: From 08/01/2022 To 10/14/2022).  You also requested expedited processing and a fee waiver.

Embassy of cuba

Expedited Processing

The FOIA provides that expedited processing is warranted if the request involves circumstances in which the lack of expedited processing could (1) reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual, or (2) an urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged federal government activity, if made by a person primarily engaged in disseminating information.  You indicated you requested expedited processing "because the public has an urgent and compelling need for information about the all information about the following delivery in August 2022/September 2022/October 2022 from USAID of PPE to Cuba: 1) How was the donation delivered- air, vessel? 2) What is the brand/manufacturer of the PPE? 3) Was the delivery directly to a Republic of Cuba government-operated entity or through first the U.S. Embassy in Havana? 4) What was the U.S. Dollar value of the delivered 43 sets of PPE? 5) What is the U.S. Dollar value of the 57 sets of PPE to be delivered? 6) Did USAID use its government funding for the purchase(s)?  (Date Range for Record Search: From 08/01/2022 To 10/14/2022).  After review of your justification, your request for expedited processing is denied.  Your rationale does not articulate an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual, nor is it an urgency to inform the public.  Below is information on how to submit an appeal for this expedited processing denial.

Fee Waiver 

The FOIA provides that fees should be waived or reduced if disclosure of the information is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations and activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.  As a member of the media, the only applicable fee is duplication.  Duplication is $0.10 per page, but the first 100 pages are free.  After review of the fee waiver criteria, your fee waiver request is moot.  Since the only applicable fee is duplication, and USAID routinely furnishes responsive records to FOIA requesters in electronic format, it's most likely there will be no duplication fees to assess.

Appeal rights 

You have a right to appeal the denial of expedited processing.  Your appeal must be received by USAID no later than 90 days from the date of this communication.  To protect its workforce from COVID-19, USAID is implementing maximum telework.  Our FOIA professionals are therefore working from home and do not have access to postal mail and fax machine.  Please send your appeal to foia@usaid.gov, and address it to the Deputy Director of the Bureau for Management, Office of Management Services.  In addition, please include your tracking number in your email. 

Extending the FOIA’s Time Limits due to Unusual Circumstances 

The FOIA provides that an agency  may extend its time limits when “unusual circumstances” occur in the processing of a request. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(B)(i) (2016).  Those “unusual circumstances” are set forth in the statute, 5 U.S.C § 552(a)(6)(B)(iii), and are described as: 1) The need to search for records from field facilities or other locations separate from the office processing the request; 2) The need to search, collect and examine voluminous records; and 3) The need for consultation with another agency.   

Based upon the records you have requested, we have determined that one or more unusual circumstances will occur during the processing of your request.  Accordingly, your response time-limit has been extended beyond the 20 days required by statute; therefore, 10 additional processing days have been added to your request.  To mitigate this action, you may limit the scope of the request so that it can be processed more quickly or to arrange an alternative time to respond.” 

LINK: In Controversial Decision, Biden-Harris Administration Directs (Indirectly) US$2 Million In U.S. Taxpayer Funds To Cuba For Hurricane Ian Support. Some Members Of Congress Irate. October 18, 2022 

US Embassy Cuba

United States Department of State
Washington DC
18 October 2022

U.S. Support for Hurricane Ian Recovery Efforts in Cuba
Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

“Following the devastating impact of Hurricane Ian, the United States is providing to the Cuban people critical humanitarian aid to trusted international partners working directly with Cubans whose communities were devastated by the storm. The United States, through the U.S. Agency for International Development, will provide $2 million in funding for emergency relief to those in need in Cuba. The United States will work with trusted, independent organizations operating in the country who have a long presence in hurricane-affected communities. We are currently reviewing applications from organizations such as the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) to provide this assistance. We stand with the Cuban people as they work to recover from this disaster. The United States will continue to monitor and assess humanitarian needs in coordination with our trusted partners and the international community, and we will continue to seek ways to provide meaningful support to the Cuban people, consistent with U.S. laws and regulations.”

Bruno Rodriguez, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cuba, using Twitter (X): "We appreciate humanitarian assistance offer made by the US. This material contribution that is worth 2 million USD, channelled through the International Federation of Red Cross, will add up to our recovery efforts in support of the victims of the ravages caused by #HurricaneIan."

United States Department of State
Washington DC
19 October 2022

Question Posed: “Prior to today's announcement that USAID was spending US$2 million in taxpayer funds for indirect assistance to Cuba, when was the last time that taxpayer funds were directed, directly or indirectly, by the United States government to Cuba?” 

United States Department of State
Washington DC
21 October 2022

“Thanks for the question and your patience. The following is offered on background and should be attributable to a State Department spokesperson:

"Each year since 1996, USAID and the Department of State have funded democracy programs that support human rights, fundamental freedoms, and democratic values in Cuba.  In September 2022, USAID provided personal protective equipment in response to diminished fire-fighting capacity following the large-scale oil fire at the Matanzas Oil Terminal. 

In 2008, USAID provided $1.6 million to non-governmental organization (NGO) partners for emergency relief supplies in response to the impact of Hurricane Gustav.  USAID also funded emergency relief commodities through a disaster response cable for damages caused by hurricanes in 2004-2006.  USAID provided $50,000 for Hurricane Charley in 2004, $100,000 for Hurricane Dennis in 2005, and $100,000 for Hurricane Wilma in 2006. 

Since early 2021, we have prioritized review of license applications to export privately sourced or donated goods to the Cuban people, focusing specifically on U.S. agricultural and medical exports to Cuba.” 

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

LINKS To Related Analysis 

Why Is USAID Administrator Samantha Power Risking Lawsuit For Failing To Disclose Data Sought By FOIA Request Filed In 2022 About PPE Deliveries In 2022 To Cuba. August 08, 2023 

In Controversial Decision, Biden-Harris Administration Directs (Indirectly) US$2 Million In U.S. Taxpayer Funds To Cuba For Hurricane Ian Support. Some Members Of Congress Irate. October 18, 2022

Diario ABC (Spain): El régimen cubano aplasta el florecimiento del sector privado. El primer estadounidense en lograr una licencia para invertir en un negocio en la isla revela...

From DIARIO ABC (Spain)

El régimen cubano aplasta el florecimiento del sector privado

El primer estadounidense en lograr una licencia para invertir en un negocio en la isla revela a ABC que lleva en el limbo casi dos años 

02/02/2024

Cubanos hacen cola para entrar en la embajada de EEUU en La Habana 

El régimen cubano ha frustrado el plan de Joe Biden de dinamizar el sector privado en la isla. Según revela a ABC el inversor que obtuvo la primera licencia del Departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU. para invertir en una empresa privada en Cuba, el Gobierno cubano no la ha autorizado en más de un año y medio. Esta negativa refleja el rechazo práctico a que la inversión extranjera expanda el sector privado. Las declaraciones contradictorias de la Administración Biden y del Gobierno cubano han llevado a los republicanos en el Capitolioa denunciar que la mayoría de estas empresas están vinculadas informalmente a la dictadura, y piden un cambio de rumbo a la Casa Blanca. 

El 10 de mayo de 2022, John Kavulich obtuvo la primera licencia concedida por el departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU. a un ciudadano norteamericano para invertir en una empresa privada en Cuba. El trámite de la licencia en EE.UU. duró 11 meses, y para ello creó una sociedad limitada. Planeaba una primera inversión de 25.000 dólares, como una prueba para abrir un camino del que podrían beneficiarse otros inversores. Era un cálculo con grandes implicaciones, según él cuenta a ABC: de algún modo, incipiente, el régimen cubano podía permitir una vía para introducir dinero extranjero a entidades privadas y dinamizar la economía. 

Más de un año y medio después de haber obtenido la licencia, el Gobierno cubano aún tiene que autorizarla. Esto, para Kavulich, refleja una negativa práctica a que la inversión extranjera pueda expandir el sector privado cubano. Kavulich preside el Consejo Económico y Comercial EE.UU.-Cuba, una organización con sede en Washington que analiza los negocios con Cuba en el influyente blog Cubatrade. 

Kavulich explica que la licencia buscaba legitimar el proceso de inversión para que los bancos lo consideraran, pero esto no ha ocurrido. El gobierno no permite la inversión, dice, lo que refleja su verdadero rechazo al sector privado. «El sector privado mostrará diferencias. Algunas personas ganarán más, otras ganarán menos, algunas se enriquecerán, otras no. Devuelve todo lo que la revolución intentaba eliminar. Y eso es muy difícil de digerir para ellos. Es como si estuvieran comiendo una piedra», afirma. 

En realidad el sector privado en Cuba tiene solo tres décadas de existencia. La dictadura promulgó un decreto en 1993 que autorizó la creación y operación de los llamados cuentapropistas, trabajadores por cuenta propia y no funcionarios. Las regulaciones sobre ellos son descomunales. En 2021 el régimen aplicó una reforma del sector privado y autorizó las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas, llamadas mipymes, que pueden operar en diversos sectores de la economía y en principio pueden generar empleo. De momento, se han dado unas 10.000 licencias a esas entidades privadas. Algunas son ya destacadas importadoras de alimentos y otros bienes esenciales en un contexto de escasez y carestía. 

Empresas vinculadas al régimen 

Por su parte, los republicanos en el Capitolio de EE.UU. denuncian que en realidad la gran mayoría de esas empresas están vinculadas informalmente al régimen: pertenecen, denuncian, a allegados de la estructura oficial. Para ello mantuvieron una audiencia el 18 de enero en el Capitolio en la que pidieron explicaciones a la Administración Biden sobre sus supuestas ayudas al sector privado y la posibilidad de que la dictadura esté violando el embargo. 

María Elvira Salazar, diputada republicana que preside la subcomisión de América Latina en la Cámara de Representantes, denuncia que estas empresas, son «una artimaña del Gobierno», y que el desarrollo y crecimiento del sector privado en Cuba es un plan del Gobierno cubano para violar el embargo estadounidense. «Sólo los hijos de los líderes cubanos lo tienen fácil para ser se propietarios en esas empresas», afirma. «El régimen cubano es un maestro del disfraz, y una vez más, este es otro ardid… Esto huele a un nuevo plan del régimen que está desesperado por millones de dólares para violar el embargo». 

«Esto huele a un nuevo plan del régimen que está desesperado por millones de dólares para violar el embargo» 

María Elvira Salazar 

Diputada republicana 

Las políticas de Biden hacia Cuba, destinadas a respaldar al sector privado, también buscan detener la migración masiva de cubanos en los últimos años. Casi el 4% de la población total de Cuba, 425.000 personas, ha abandonado la isla y ha entrado en EE.UU. en los años fiscales 2022 y 2023. Estas cifras no incluyen otros miles de cubanos emigrados a otros países como Colombia, Brasil o España. Desde 2017, por decisión de Barack Obama, EE.UU. no ofrece residencia inmediata a los cubanos exiliados, por lo que muchos de esos huidos de la dictadura son repatriados en vuelos masificados del servicio de inmigración. Otros son deportados a México. 

La lentitud de procesar estas licencias en Cuba tiene implicaciones también para quienes tengan interés en invertir desde España. Es cierto que grandes empresas como Meliá hacen negocios en Cuba, pero siempre con el régimen, que controla el sector del turismo a través de empresas estatales como Gaviota. 

Las políticas de Biden hacia Cuba, destinadas a respaldar al sector privado, también buscan detener la migración masiva de cubanos en los últimos años 

Según explica Kavulich, su plan era oficializar la inversión en Cuba, algo sin precedentes. Aunque en los últimos años millones de dólares han sido ingresados en Cuba, principalmente desde el sur de Florida y España, no es algo que haya sido autorizado por el gobierno cubano. «Obtuvimos una licencia para hacerlo público y accesible a empresas e inversores internacionales, ya que sin legitimación, parece peligroso e ilegítimo invertir en la isla», dice Kavulich. «Tenemos la licencia para que todos lo sepan, empresas en España, inversores en España, Canadá, la UE, EE.UU., en todas partes, porque todos estamos en la misma posición. Una persona en España no puede proporcionar inversión o financiamiento a una empresa privada en Cuba, al igual que yo no puedo», añade. 

Levantamiento parcial de sanciones 

En mayo de 2022, la Administración Biden levantó parcialmente sanciones sobre Cuba, con la expansión de vuelos más allá de La Habana y la reactivación de un programa para reunificar familias cubanas en EE.UU. La restricción impuesta durante la presidencia de Donald Trump que limitaba las remesas familiares a 1.000 dólares cada tres meses fue levantada y ahí es cuando se anunció que se flexibilizaba la prohibición de remesas a no familiares para permitir el pago a emprendedores cubanos independientes. Fue entonces cuando el Departamento del Tesoro emitió la primera licencia para permitir la inversión directa en acciones en una empresa privada cubana. 

Biden llegó a la Casa Blanca con la intención, dijo en campaña, de revertir muchas de las restricciones impuestas al régimen cubano durante la era Trump. Sin embargo, en julio de 2021, apenas cinco meses después de que asumiera el cargo, estallaron protestas contra la dictadura en la isla, las más significativas en décadas. Fueron impulsadas por el descontento por la situación económica, la escasez de alimentos y medicinas, los apagones eléctricos y las restricciones a la libertad de expresión. El régimen respondió con una ola represora. Grupos de derechos cubanos informan de que más de 1.400 personas fueron detenidas, de las cuales al menos 380 fueron condenadas. 

Desde 1960, el embargo de Estados Unidos restringe el comercio y las relaciones con Cuba, con el objetivo de presionar al Gobierno cubano para promover cambios políticos y económicos. La Administración de Obama trató de revertirlo, dando el embargo por fallido. Trump impidió más aperturas. 

Google Translate 

The Cuban regime crushes the flourishing of the private sector

The first American to obtain a license to invest in a business on the island reveals to ABC that he has been in limbo for almost two years  

02/02/2024 Cubans queue to enter the US embassy in Havana  

The Cuban regime has frustrated Joe Biden's plan to boost the private sector on the island.  

According to what the investor who obtained the first license from the US Treasury Department to invest in a private company in Cuba reveals to ABC, the Cuban Government has not authorized it in more than a year and a half. This refusal reflects the practical rejection of foreign investment expanding the private sector.  

The contradictory statements of the Biden Administration and the Cuban Government have led Republicans on Capitol Hill to denounce that the majority of these companies are informally linked to the dictatorship, and ask the White House for a change of course.  

On May 10, 2022, John Kavulich obtained the first license granted by the US Treasury Department to a North American citizen to invest in a private company in Cuba. The licensing process in the US lasted 11 months, and for this he created a limited company. He planned a first investment of $25,000, as a test to open a path from which other investors could benefit. It was a calculation with great implications, according to what he tells ABC: in some incipient way, the Cuban regime could allow a way to introduce foreign money to private entities and boost the economy.  

More than a year and a half after obtaining the license, the Cuban Government has yet to authorize it.  This, for Kavulich, reflects a practical refusal to allow foreign investment to expand the Cuban private sector.  

Kavulich chairs the US-Cuba Economic and Trade Council, a Washington-based organization that analyzes business with Cuba on the influential Cubatrade blog.  

Kavulich explains that the license sought to legitimize the investment process so that banks would consider it, but this has not happened. The government does not allow investment, he says, reflecting his true rejection of the private sector.  

«The private sector will show differences. Some people will earn more, some will earn less, some will get richer, some will not. It returns everything that the revolution tried to eliminate. And that is very difficult for them to digest. "It's like they are eating a stone," he says.  

In reality, the private sector in Cuba has only three decades of existence. The dictatorship promulgated a decree in 1993 that authorized the creation and operation of so-called self-employed workers, self-employed workers and non-civil servants.  

The regulations on them are enormous.  

In 2021, the regime applied a reform of the private sector and authorized micro, small and medium-sized companies, called MSMEs, which can operate in various sectors of the economy and in principle can generate employment. At the moment, about 10,000 licenses have been given to these private entities. Some are already prominent importers of food and other essential goods in a context of scarcity and famine.  

Companies linked to the regime 

For their part, Republicans in the US Capitol denounce that in reality the vast majority of these companies are informally linked to the regime: they belong, they denounce, to those close to the official structure.  

To this end, they held a hearing on January 18 at the Capitol in which they asked the Biden Administration for explanations about its alleged aid to the private sector and the possibility that the dictatorship is violating the embargo. María Elvira Salazar, Republican representative who chairs the Latin America subcommittee in the House of Representatives, denounces that these companies are "a government ruse," and that the development and growth of the private sector in Cuba is a plan of the Cuban Government to violate the US embargo.  

"Only the children of Cuban leaders have it easy to be owners in these companies," she says. "The Cuban regime is a master of disguise, and once again, this is another ruse... This smacks of a new plan by the regime that is desperate for millions of dollars to violate the embargo." "This smells like a new plan by the regime that is desperate for millions of dollars to violate the embargo"  

Maria Elvira Salazar Republican representative Biden's policies toward Cuba, aimed at supporting the private sector, also seek to stop the mass migration of Cubans in recent years. Almost 4% of Cuba's total population, 425,000 people, have left the island and entered the US in fiscal years 2022 and 2023. These figures do not include thousands of other Cubans who emigrated to other countries such as Colombia, Brazil or Spain.  

Since 2017, by decision of Barack Obama, the US does not offer immediate residence to Cuban exiles, which is why many of those fleeing the dictatorship are repatriated on overcrowded immigration service flights. Others are deported to Mexico. The slowness of processing these licenses in Cuba also has implications for those interested in investing from Spain. It is true that large companies like Meliá do business in Cuba, but always with the regime, which controls the tourism sector through state companies like Gaviota. Biden's policies towards Cuba, aimed at supporting the private sector, also seek to stop the mass migration of Cubans in recent years 

Biden's policies toward Cuba, aimed at supporting the private sector, also seek to stop the mass migration of Cubans in recent years. Almost 4% of Cuba's total population, 425,000 people, have left the island and entered the US in fiscal years 2022 and 2023.  

These figures do not include thousands of other Cubans who emigrated to other countries such as Colombia, Brazil or Spain. Since 2017, by decision of Barack Obama, the US does not offer immediate residence to Cuban exiles, which is why many of those fleeing the dictatorship are repatriated on overcrowded immigration service flights. Others are deported to Mexico.  

The slowness of processing these licenses in Cuba also has implications for those interested in investing from Spain. It is true that large companies like Meliá do business in Cuba, but always with the regime, which controls the tourism sector through state companies like Gaviota. Biden's policies towards Cuba, aimed at supporting the private sector, also seek to stop the mass migration of Cubans in recent years  

As Kavulich explains, his plan was to make the investment in Cuba official, something unprecedented. Although millions of dollars have been brought into Cuba in recent years, mainly from southern Florida and Spain, it is not something that has been authorized by the Cuban government.  

“We obtained a license to make it public and accessible to international companies and investors, since without legitimation, it seems dangerous and illegitimate to invest in the island,” says Kavulich.  

«We have the license so that everyone knows, companies in Spain, investors in Spain, Canada, the EU, the US, everywhere, because we are all in the same position. A person in Spain cannot provide investment or financing to a private company in Cuba, just as I cannot," he adds.  

Partial lifting of sanctions 

In May 2022, the Biden Administration partially lifted sanctions on Cuba, with the expansion of flights beyond Havana and the reactivation of a program to reunify Cuban families in the United States.  

The restriction imposed during the presidency of Donald Trump that limited family remittances of $1,000 every three months was lifted and that is when it was announced that the ban on remittances to non-family members would be made more flexible to allow payment to independent Cuban entrepreneurs.  

It was then that the Treasury Department issued the first license to allow direct investment in shares in a private Cuban company. Biden arrived at the White House with the intention, he said during the campaign, of reversing many of the restrictions imposed on the Cuban regime during the Trump era.  

However, in July 2021, just five months after he took office, protests against the dictatorship broke out on the island, the most significant in decades. They were driven by discontent over the economic situation, food and medicine shortages, electrical blackouts, and restrictions on freedom of expression.  

The regime responded with a wave of repression. Cuban rights groups report that more than 1,400 people were detained, of whom at least 380 were convicted. Since 1960, the United States embargo has restricted trade and relations with Cuba, with the aim of pressuring the Cuban Government to promote political and economic changes. The Obama Administration tried to reverse it, considering the embargo failed. Trump prevented further openings.

Nearing Decision? Updates From U.S. Court Of Appeals In Exxon Mobil Corporation V. Corporacion Cimex (Cuba), et al.

Court of Appeals Docket #: 21-7127    Docketed: 11/03/2021
Nature of Suit: 3890 Other Statutory Actions    
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), et al    
Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia    
Fee Status: Fee Paid    
Case Type Information: 1) Civil Private 2) Private 3)
Originating Court Information:
District: 0090-1 : 1:19-cv-01277-APM
Lead: 1:19-cv-01277-APM

Trial Judge: Amit Priyavadan Mehta, U.S. District Judge    
Date Filed: 05/02/2019            
Date Order/Judgment: 10/08/21        
Date NOA Filed: 10/31/21           
Prior Cases: None

PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-7127] [Entered: 11/03/2021 02:36 PM]

73 pg, 98.05 MB    NOTICE OF APPEAL [1920820] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-01277-APM filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba). Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-7127. [21-7127] [Entered: 11/03/2021 02:41 PM]

2 pg, 45.92 KB    CLERK'S ORDER [1920823] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 12/03/2021. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 12/03/2021. APPELLANT statement of issues due 12/03/2021. APPELLANT underlying decision due 12/03/2021. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 12/03/2021. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 12/03/2021. APPELLANT transcript status report due 12/03/2021. APPELLANT procedural motions due 12/03/2021. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 12/20/2021; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 12/03/2021. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 12/03/2021. APPELLEE procedural motions due 12/03/2021. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 12/20/2021 [21-7127] [Entered: 11/03/2021 02:45 PM]
   
1 pg, 64.56 KB    ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1923813] filed by Steven K. Davidson and co-counsel Shannen W. Coffin and Michael J. Baratz on behalf of Appellee Exxon Mobil Corporation. [21-7127] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 11/23/2021 03:19 PM]

4 pg, 98.51 KB    CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1923815] filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation [Service Date: 11/23/2021 ] [21-7127] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 11/23/2021 03:21 PM]
    
3 pg, 95.83 KB    STATEMENT [1923818] with Disclosure Listing filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation [Service Date: 11/23/2021 ] [21-7127] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 11/23/2021 03:24 PM]
   
4 pg, 353.68 KB    CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1924513] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) [Service Date: 11/30/2021 ] [21-7127] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 11/30/2021 10:18 AM]
    
2 pg, 91.33 KB    DOCKETING STATEMENT [1924535] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) [Service Date: 11/30/2021 ] [21-7127] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 11/30/2021 10:55 AM]
    
1 pg, 1.12 MB    ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1924539] filed by Michael Krinsky and co-counsel Lindsey Frank on behalf of Appellant Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba). [21-7127] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 11/30/2021 10:59 AM]
    
2 pg, 270.46 KB    STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1924542] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) [Service Date: 11/30/2021 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [21-7127] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:01 AM]
    
3 pg, 517.82 KB    STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1924545] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) [Service Date: 11/30/2021 ] [21-7127] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:03 AM]
    
1 pg, 476.09 KB    TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1924547] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) [Service Date: 11/30/2021 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - All transcripts needed for the appeal have been completed and received. [21-7127] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:08 AM]
    
62 pg, 1.22 MB    UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1924548] submitted by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) [Service Date: 11/30/2021 ] [21-7127] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:10 AM]
    
1 pg, 38.8 KB    CLERK'S ORDER [1935721] filed consolidating cases 22-7019, 22-7020 (Cross-appeal started 02/18/2022) with 21-7127 [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 02/18/2022 09:12 AM]
    
15 pg, 1.1 MB    NOTICE [1936492] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for payment of docketing fee [Case Number 22-7019: Fee Paid] [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 02/24/2022 12:05 PM]
    
1 pg, 1.12 MB    ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1937132] filed by Michael Krinsky and co-counsel Lindsey Frank; Nathan Yaffe on behalf of Appellant Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Appellees Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, Appellee Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Appellants Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7019, Appellees Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Frank, Lindsey) [Entered: 03/01/2022 11:41 AM]
    
3 pg, 80.11 KB    CLERK'S ORDER [1937852] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 04/13/2022. APPELLEE & CROSS-APPELLANT Brief due 05/13/2022. APPELLANT REPLY & CROSS-APPELLEE Brief due 06/13/2022. CROSS-APPELLANT Reply Brief due 07/05/2022. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 07/12/2022. Final Briefs due 07/26/2022. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 03/04/2022 04:51 PM]
    
8 pg, 705.16 KB    JOINT UNOPPOSED MOTION [1938298] to extend time to file brief filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020 Length Certification: 1,218. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 03/08/2022 05:59 PM]
    
2 pg, 493.87 KB    CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH TYPE-VOLUME LIMITS [1938338] for motion [1938298-2] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 03/09/2022 10:04 AM]
    
1 pg, 40.85 KB    CLERK'S ORDER [1938494] filed granting joint motion to extend time [1938298-2], The following revised briefing schedule will now apply: APPELLANT Brief due 05/11/2022. APPELLEE & CROSS-APPELLANT Brief due 07/11/2022. APPELLANT REPLY & CROSS-APPELLEE Brief due 09/12/2022. CROSS-APPELLANT Reply Brief due 10/12/2022. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 10/19/2022. Final Briefs due 11/02/2022. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 03/09/2022 05:55 PM]
    
177 pg, 63.68 MB    APPELLANT BRIEF [1946354] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) in 21-7127, Union Cuba-Petroleo and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) in 22-7019 [Service Date: 05/11/2022 ] Length of Brief: 12,856. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 05/11/2022 02:23 PM]
    
1403 pg, 18.63 MB    APPELLEE & CROSS-APPELLANT BRIEF [1954417] filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 [Service Date: 07/11/2022 ] Length of Brief: 15,201 words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 07/11/2022 07:14 PM]
    
56 pg, 394.37 KB    MOTION [1955514] to participate as amicus curiae [Disclosure Listing: Attached] filed by EarthRights International [Service Date: 07/18/2022 ] [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020]--[Edited 07/19/2022 by TAM] (Simons, Marco) [Entered: 07/18/2022 10:06 PM]
    
47 pg, 265.9 KB    AMICUS FOR APPELLEE BRIEF [1955546] lodged by EarthRights International [Service Date: 07/18/2022 ] Length of Brief: 6,478 words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 07/19/2022 09:58 AM]
    
47 pg, 251.74 KB    CORRECTED AMICUS FOR APPELLEE BRIEF [1955620] lodged by EarthRights International in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 [Service Date: 07/19/2022 ] Length of Brief: 6,478. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020]--[Edited 07/19/2022 by LMM] (Simons, Marco) [Entered: 07/19/2022 12:49 PM]
    
8 pg, 1.6 MB    RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1956818] to motion [1955514-2] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020 [Service Date: 07/28/2022 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 771 Words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 07/28/2022 12:36 PM]
    
7 pg, 98.95 KB    REPLY [1957565] filed by EarthRights International in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 to response [1956818-2] [Service Date: 08/02/2022 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 596 words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Simons, Marco) [Entered: 08/02/2022 04:04 PM]
    
1 pg, 38.9 KB    PER CURIAM ORDER [1958882] filed granting motion to participate as amicus curiae [1955514-2]. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged corrected amicus brief. Before Judges: Pillard and Katsas. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 08/11/2022 10:57 AM]
08/11/2022           PER ABOVE ORDER lodged Amicus brief [1955620-2] is filed [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 08/11/2022 11:01 AM]
    
15 pg, 380.95 KB    UNOPPOSED MOTION [1959617] to exceed word limits in memo of law filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) in 21-7127, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7019 [Service Date: 08/16/2022 ] Length Certification: 2,202 Words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 08/16/2022 04:40 PM]
    
1 pg, 39.24 KB    PER CURIAM ORDER [1960396] filed granting motion to exceed word limits [1959617-2]. Corporación CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporación CIMEX, S.A. (Panama), and Unión Cuba-Petróleo may file an Appellants’ Reply / Cross-Appellees’ Brief not to exceed 17,000 words. Before Judges: Pillard, Rao and Walker. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 08/23/2022 11:19 AM]
    
1135 pg, 48.02 MB    APPELLANT REPLY & CROSS APPELLEE BRIEF [1963216] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama), Union Cuba-Petroleo and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) in 22-7020 [Service Date: 09/12/2022 ] Length of Brief: 16,933. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 09/12/2022 09:04 PM]
    
1 pg, 98.91 KB    ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1967455] filed by Steven K. Davidson and co-counsel Michael G. Scavelli on behalf of Appellee Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, Appellant Exxon Mobil Corporation in 22-7020. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Scavelli, Michael) [Entered: 10/04/2022 02:42 PM]
    
9 pg, 135.57 KB    UNOPPOSED MOTION [1967462] to exceed word limits in reply filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 [Service Date: 10/04/2022 ] Length Certification: 1,085 words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 10/04/2022 02:56 PM]
    
1 pg, 39.38 KB    PER CURIAM ORDER [1968383] filed granting motion to exceed word limits [1967462-2]. Exxon Mobil Corporation may file a Cross-Appellant’s Reply Brief not to exceed 8,500 words. Before Judges: Wilkins and Pan. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 10/11/2022 04:23 PM]
    
708 pg, 16.01 MB    CROSS-APPELLANT REPLY BRIEF [1968692] filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 [Service Date: 10/12/2022 ] Length of Brief: 8,216 words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 10/12/2022 07:56 PM]
    
2172 pg, 47.44 MB    JOINT APPENDIX [1969641] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama), Exxon Mobil Corporation and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Exxon Mobil Corporation and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama), Union Cuba-Petroleo and Exxon Mobil Corporation in 22-7020 [Volumes: 4] [Service Date: 10/19/2022 ] [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 10/19/2022 10:32 AM]
    
55 pg, 4.98 MB    MOTION [1970167] to strike the brief, Strike Section II(C) of Exxon Mobil Corporation's Reply Brief and, in the alternative, for leave to file a Sur-Reply to the Reply Brief filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020 (Service Date: 10/23/2022 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 2,862 words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 10/23/2022 12:28 PM]
    
39 pg, 3.41 MB    APPELLANT & CROSS APPELLEE SURREPLY BRIEF [1970391] lodged by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo [Service Date: 10/23/2022] Length of Brief: 4,881 words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 10/25/2022 10:09 AM]
    
177 pg, 28.59 MB    APPELLANT FINAL BRIEF [1971794] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) in 21-7127, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7019 [Service Date: 11/02/2022 ] Length of Brief: 12,892 Words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 11/02/2022 01:51 PM]
    
1152 pg, 55.7 MB    APPELLANT REPLY & CROSS APPELLEE FINAL BRIEF [1971798] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020 [Service Date: 11/02/2022 ] Length of Brief: 16,926 Word. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 11/02/2022 02:06 PM]
    
8 pg, 157.14 KB    RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1971900] to motion to strike document [1970167-2], motion for other relief [1970167-3] filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 [Service Date: 11/02/2022 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 1,322. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 11/02/2022 07:07 PM]
    
1403 pg, 18.79 MB    APPELLEE & CROSS-APPELLANT FINAL BRIEF [1971901] filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 [Service Date: 11/02/2022 ] Length of Brief: 15,088. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 11/02/2022 07:13 PM]
    
708 pg, 16.05 MB    CROSS-APPELLANT FINAL REPLY BRIEF [1971902] filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in 22-7020 [Service Date: 11/02/2022 ] Length of Brief: 8,184. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 11/02/2022 07:16 PM]
    
15 pg, 1.69 MB    REPLY [1972434] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020 to response and RESPONSE IN SUPPORT filed to Cross Motion [1970167-2], [1970167-3] [Service Date: 11/07/2022 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 2,486 Words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 11/07/2022 12:54 PM]
    
1415 pg, 20.95 MB    CORRECTED APPELLEE & CROSS-APPELLANT FINAL BRIEF [1972774] filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 [Service Date: 11/08/2022 ] Length of Brief: 15,088. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 11/08/2022 05:24 PM]
    
712 pg, 16.74 MB    CORRECTED CROSS-APPELLANT FINAL REPLY BRIEF [1972775] filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 [Service Date: 11/08/2022 ] Length of Brief: 8,184. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 11/08/2022 05:39 PM]
    
1 pg, 40.74 KB    CLERK'S ORDER [1973385] filed scheduling oral argument on Thursday, 01/19/2023. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 11/14/2022 10:15 AM]
    
12 pg, 2.56 MB    ERRATA [1979679] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020 to Appellant/Cross-Appellee final brief [1971798-2], Appellant/Petitioner final brief [1971794-2] . Reason for errata: need to correct miscite for a referenced document and correct pin cites to cited authority.. [Service Date: 12/31/2022 ] [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 12/31/2022 08:34 PM]
    
99 pg, 3.66 MB    CORRECTED APPELLANT REPLY & CROSS APPELLEE FINAL BRIEF [1979859] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020 [Service Date: 01/03/2023 ] Length of Brief: 16,927 words.. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 01/03/2023 02:24 PM]
    
2 pg, 42.91 KB    PER CURIAM ORDER [1980426] filed allocating oral argument time as follows: Appellant/Cross-Appellee Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. - 15 Minutes, Appellee/Cross-Appellant Exxon Mobil Corporation - 15 Minutes. One counsel per side to argue, Form 72 notice of arguing attorney [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 01/06/2023 10:51 AM]
01/09/2023           FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Steven K. Davidson, on behalf of Appellee Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, Appellant Exxon Mobil Corporation in 22-7020 (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information). [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 01/09/2023 09:46 AM]

FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Michael R. Krinsky, on behalf of Appellant Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Appellees Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, Appellee Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Appellants Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7019, Appellees Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020 (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information). [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 01/10/2023 07:32 AM]
    
1 pg, 41.37 KB    ORAL ARGUMENT HELD before Judges Srinivasan, Pillard and Randolph. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 01/19/2023 12:18 PM]
02/06/2023           TRANSCRIPT [1984708] of oral argument (For Internal Use Only: Transcript is only available to court staff). [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] [Entered: 02/06/2023 01:09 PM]
    
28 pg, 360.83 KB    LETTER [1996644] pursuant to FRAP 28j advising of additional authorities filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 [Service Date: 04/26/2023 ] [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 04/26/2023 05:52 PM]
    
2 pg, 555.86 KB    RESPONSE [1997675] to letter [1996644-2], letter [1996644-3] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020 [Service Date: 05/03/2023 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 339 words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 05/03/2023 11:33 AM]
    
21 pg, 279.97 KB    LETTER [1999278] pursuant to FRAP 28j advising of additional authorities filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 [Service Date: 05/15/2023 ] [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 05/15/2023 05:22 PM]
    
2 pg, 437.93 KB    RESPONSE [1999802] to letter Rule 28j authorities [1999278-2], letter [1999278-3] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020 [Service Date: 05/18/2023 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 257 words. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 05/18/2023 11:31 AM]
    
42 pg, 577.34 KB    LETTER [2004475] pursuant to FRAP 28j advising of additional authorities filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in 21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020 [Service Date: 06/21/2023 ] [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Davidson, Steven) [Entered: 06/21/2023 10:45 PM]
    
2 pg, 435.45 KB    RESPONSE [2005018] to letter Rule 28j authorities [2004475-2], letter [2004475-3] filed by Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba) and Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 21-7127, 22-7019, Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Cuba), Corporacion CIMEX, S.A. (Panama) and Union Cuba-Petroleo in 22-7020 [Service Date: 06/26/2023 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 326 words.. [21-7127, 22-7019, 22-7020] (Krinsky, Michael) [Entered: 06/26/2023 12:30 PM]

LINKS TO RELATED COURT DOCUMENTS

06/26/23- LETTER FROM DEFENDANT'S ATTORNEY
01/03/23- CORRECTED REPLY AND RESPONSE BRIEF FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES
12/03/21- PETITIONERS CORPORACIÓN CIMEX, S.A. (PANAMA) AND UNIÓN CUBA-PETRÓLEO’S PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(B)

From EXXON MOBIL